www.teitimes.com
January 2022 • Volume 14 • No 11 • Published monthly • ISSN 1757-7365
THE ENERGY INDUSTRY TIMES is published by Man in Black Media • www.mibmedia.com • Editor-in-Chief: Junior Isles • For all enquiries email: enquiries@teitimes.com
The missing piece
Coal on a comeback?
Waste-to-energy is the
missing part of the EU
taxonomy puzzle.
Page 13
The International Energy Agency
examines the reasons behind
record coal use in 2021.
Page 14
News In Brief
Revised TEN-E rules will
boost hydrogen
Revised rules of the Trans-European
network for Energy (TEN-E)
Regulation have been introduced to
support the European Green Deal
and looks set to provide a much
needed boost for hydrogen.
Page 2
Canada ‘can reduce
unabated fossil use by 2050’
Canada can reduce its unabated
fossil fuel use by 62 per cent by
2050, even as electricity and oil
demand grows, according to a new
report from the Canada Energy
Regulator.
Page 4
Australia going major on
hydrogen
The Government of the Northern
Territory (NT) in Australia has
awarded ‘Major Project Status’ to
the A$15.0 billion Desert Bloom
green hydrogen project, to fast-track
the approval process as the country
strives to become a hydrogen
exporter.
Page 6
UK energy crisis highlights
renewables investment
The UK has opened its fourth
renewables tender, with Contracts
for Difference on offer for 12 GW
of capacity – more than the previous
three rounds combined.
Page 7
Middle East and Africa set
for solar PV capacity boost
Nearly 20 GW of solar power
is expected to be added over the
next ve years in the Middle East
& North Africa (MENA) region,
according to a report by the Arab
Petroleum Investments Corporation,
Page 8
Utilities gear-up for energy
transition
Several major European utilities
have recently made signicant
investments as they prepare to
operate in the changing energy
landscape.
Page 9
Technology Focus:
Hydrogen makes progress
with plastics
Peel NRE is progressing with plans
to roll-out plastics-to-hydrogen
technology.
Page 15
Advertise
advertising@teitimes.com
Subscribe
subscriptions@teitimes.com
or call +44 208 523 2573
A rebounding economy and high gas prices have pushed coal red power generation to an
all-time, threatening net zero goals according to a recent report. Junior Isles
Climate change drives large-scale changes in energy and
utilities sector, says Capgemini report
THE ENERGY INDUSTRY
TIMES
Final Word
Coal looks like the
Mark Twain of energy,
says Junior Isles.
Page 16
The amount of electricity generated
worldwide from coal was surging to-
wards a new annual record in 2021,
undermining efforts to reduce green-
house gas emissions and potentially
putting global coal demand on course
for an all-time in 2022, says a new
report.
According to the International En-
ergy Agency’s (IEA) latest annual
market report, global power genera-
tion from coal is expected to jump by
9 per cent in 2021 to an all-time high
of 10 350 TWh, after falling in 2019
and 2020.
The IEA said record demand for coal
in power generation was driven by
the economic recovery from the pan-
demic. This caused electricity demand
to outstrip supply from renewable
energy and low carbon energy. The
record-breaking increase in natural
gas prices also added to consumption,
making it cheaper and more protable
for utility companies to burn coal in
their power stations.
Overall coal demand worldwide –
including uses beyond power genera-
tion, such as cement and steel produc-
tion – is forecast to grow by 6 per cent
in 2021. That increase will not take it
above the record levels it reached in
2013 and 2014. But, depending on
weather patterns and economic
growth, overall coal demand could
reach new all-time highs as soon as
2022 and remain at that level for the
following two years, underscoring the
need for fast and strong policy action.
In 2020, global coal demand fell by
4.4 per cent, the largest decline in de-
cades but much smaller than the an-
nual drop that was initially expected at
the height of the lockdowns early in
the pandemic, the report shows. Re-
gional disparities were large. Coal
demand grew by 1 per cent for the full
year in China, where the economy be-
gan recovering much earlier than else-
where, whereas it dropped by nearly
20 per cent in the US and the Euro-
pean Union, and by 8 per cent in India
and South Africa.
“Coal is the single largest source of
global carbon emissions, and this
years historically high level of coal
power generation is a worrying sign of
how far off track the world is in its
efforts to put emissions into decline
towards net zero,” said IEA Executive
Director Fatih Birol.
Keisuke Sadamori, Director of En-
ergy Markets and Security at the IEA,
added: “The pledges to reach net zero
emissions made by many countries,
including China and India, should
have very strong implications for coal
– but these are not yet visible in our
near-term forecast, reecting the ma-
jor gap between ambitions and action.
Asia dominates the global coal mar-
ket, with China and India accounting
for two-thirds of overall demand.
These two economies – dependent on
coal and with a combined population
of almost 3 billion people – hold the
key to future coal demand.”
In China, where more than half of
Continued on Page 2
Energy and utility organisations that
have implemented new energy models
are reporting multiple benets, accord-
ing to a new report from the Capgem-
ini Research Institute.
The report, titled ‘Remodeling the
future: How energy transition is driv-
ing new models in energy and utili-
ties’, says new energy models are
transforming the entire energy and
utilities sector, as mitigating the im-
pact of climate change has become its
raison d’être.
Climate change and investor de-
mand are principal drivers of change.
Almost 70 per cent of energy and util-
ity organisations (68 per cent) say that
mitigating the impact of climate
change is driving their shift towards
new ways of doing business, 63 per
cent cite investor demand as the impe-
tus for change. While just 44 per cent
of executives are guided by protabil-
ity as the leading driver for a shift to
new models, the potential benets for
the bottom line are clear.
According to Capgemini, however,
the sector remains in a state of transi-
tion and while the critical need to
transform is apparent, there are very
few organisations currently imple-
menting new energy models. For in-
stance, while 64 per cent of organisa-
tions plan to implement energy
storage solutions in the future, just 19
per cent are already doing so. Further,
just 18 per cent of those surveyed say
they have a global strategy with well
dened goals and target timelines.
In November research from CDP,
the World Benchmarking Alliance
and ADEME (the French Agency for
Ecological Transition) found almost
all companies across the electric utili-
ties sector are set to exceed their
1.5°C warming scenario budgets. It
says 98 per cent companies in the
electric utilities sector are set to ex-
ceed their carbon budgets.
Overall the companies assessed will
exceed their total carbon budget by 57
per cent up to 2035. Just three out of
50 companies (Ørsted, EDP and AES
Corporation) have emissions targets
that align with the IEAs 1.5°C warm-
ing scenario. Only Ørsted is projected
to stay within its carbon budget be-
tween now and 2035.
Given their continued reliance on
fossil fuels, the climate performance
of 35 companies in this sector is ex-
pected to decline in the near term. To
be fully aligned with a 1.5°C pathway,
78 per cent of companies’ electricity
generating capacity needs to come
from renewables by 2030. Currently,
only eight companies are investing at
these levels. There are no companies
in the sample with a zero carbon port-
folio and for 34 companies, coal ac-
counts for more than 10 per cent of
their capacity.
The sector has performed well on
pursuing a Just Transition, with Euro-
pean headquartered companies dem-
onstrating the highest levels of best
practice on planning for and mitigat-
ing the social impacts of their low-
carbon transition on workers, com-
munities and affected stakeholders.
Coal power rebound
Coal power rebound
threatening net zero goals
threatening net zero goals
THE ENERGY INDUSTRY TIMES - JANUARY 2022
2
Junior Isles
Revised rules of the Trans-European
network for Energy (TEN-E) Regula-
tion have been introduced to support
the European Green Deal and look set
to provide a much needed boost for
hydrogen.
On December 14, 2021, the Euro-
pean Union’s Council, Parliament,
and Commission agreed in principle
on new EU rules for cross-border en-
ergy infrastructure and future Projects
of Common Interest (PCIs) under the
TEN-E framework. The agreement
comes after the European Commis-
sion tabled a proposal for renewing
the regulation in 2020, with an aim to
modernise the existing regulation and
fully align it with the objectives of the
Green Deal.
Key elements of the political agree-
ment include a strengthened frame-
work for the cross-border cooperation
to accelerate the implementation of
offshore grids as a key element of the
energy transition, a strengthened fo-
cus on infrastructure categories such
as smart electricity grids, a widened
scope to include hydrogen networks
as well as a mandatory sustainability
assessment for all eligible projects.
“Now is the time to invest in the
energy infrastructure of the future.
The revised TEN-E rules will allow
clean technologies to be plugged in to
our energy system – including off-
shore wind and hydrogen. We need to
update and upgrade now to achieve
the Green Deal’s goal of climate neu-
trality by 2050,” said Executive Vice-
President for the EU Green Deal,
Frans Timmermans.
The revised rules also bring new pro-
visions on support for projects con-
necting the EU with third countries,
Projects of Mutual Interest (PMIs), that
contribute to the EU’s energy and cli-
mate objectives in terms of security of
supply and decarbonisation.
The new rules came as the Interna-
tional Energy Agency (IEA) called for
more ambitious and concrete hydro-
gen policy efforts from governments
across Europe and beyond to bridge a
wide gap between the current market
trajectory and the projects needed to
meet net zero targets.
Speaking at the S&P Global Platts
Hydrogen Markets Europe Confer-
ence in late November, Jose Bermu-
dez, the IEAs energy technology
analyst for hydrogen and alternative
fuels, said that under the IEAs net zero
scenario, hydrogen demand of around
90 million mt/year in 2020 would
roughly double by 2030, with a six-
fold increase by 2050. However, un-
der current trends, the IEA expects the
market to reach just 105 million mt/
year by 2030, with most growth lim-
ited to traditional sectors, or to rise to
120 million mt/year by that date if
existing government pledges are met.
The EU has a target to produce 10
million tonnes of renewable hydro-
gen by 2030, though vast quantities
of new renewable power capacity will
be required.
Bermudez said carbon auctions and
contracts for differences could play a
potential role in developing the hy-
drogen market, but almost no such
schemes have come into force yet.
global coal red electricity genera-
tion takes place, coal power is ex-
pected to grow by 9 per cent in 2021
despite a deceleration at the end of
the year. In India, it is forecast to
grow by 12 per cent. This would set
new all-time highs in both countries,
even as they roll-out impressive
amounts of solar and wind capacity.
While coal power generation is set
to increase by almost 20 per cent
this year in the United States and
the European Union, that is not
enough to take it above 2019 levels.
Coal use in those two markets is
expected to go back into decline
next year amid slow electricity
demand growth and rapid expan-
sion of renewable power.
Last month Greece became the
latest country in Europe to an-
nounce a timeline for ending coal
red power generation.
Greece is to introduce its rst cli-
mate law, pledging to cut its reliance
on coal within six years as part of a
move to a carbon net zero economy
by 2050.
The law comes after the country
suffered devastating wildres this
year when summer heat soared that
was attributed partly to global
warming.
“The national climate law is of
historic importance . . . in order to
deal with the climate crisis and
achieve climate neutrality by 2050,”
said Kostas Skrekas, Environment
and Energy Minister.
The law foresees an intermediate
target of reducing greenhouse gas
emissions by 55 per cent by 2030.
As part of its plans Greece will
phase-out production of lignite, a
particularly polluting form of coal,
within the next six years. The deci-
sion will be reconsidered by 2023
with an eye to accelerating an exit.
Greece is one of the EU countries
that relies most heavily on coal for
energy and has been a laggard with-
in the EU in cutting emissions. Ger-
many has cut its emissions 38 per
cent from 1990 levels, according to
UN data, while Greece has cut its
emissions by less than 19 per cent
over the same period.
n Last year (2021) will surpass the
2020 record, with 290 GW of new
renewables capacity installed, de-
spite rising prices for some com-
ponents and transport, highlights
the IEAs ‘Renewables’ report. Ac-
cording to the IEA, which revised
and raised its projections, 4800
GW of installations will be avail-
able by 2026, which means 60 per
cent more than in comparison with
2020 and the equivalent of the cur-
rent power capacity from nuclear
and fossil energies together. Pho-
tovoltaics will account for more
than 50 per cent of this increase,
and offshore wind will triple its
capacities.
Continued from Page 1
Gas and nuclear were likely to have
“amber” status, meaning they would
not be in the “green” category with
wind and solar power, but would fea-
ture in the EU taxonomy, the EU’s
ambitious labelling system for green
investment, according to a EU ofcial.
At the time of writing, the European
Commission was expected to publish
the draft taxonomy – the second del-
egated act – on 31 December, allowing
a few weeks of consultation with ex-
perts and governments. The nal pro-
posals may be published on 12 Janu-
ary and could only be blocked by a
super-majority of 15 EU member
states.
It will describe the sustainable cri-
teria for renewable energy, car manu-
facturing, shipping, forestry and bio-
energy and more, and include a
“technology-neutral” benchmark at
100 grams of CO
2
/kWh for any invest-
ments in energy production.
The EU taxonomy is a green clas-
sication system that is intended to
guide investors to projects that are in
line with Europe’s goal of net zero
emissions by 2050 and better protec-
tion of the environment.
Both gas and nuclear were expected
to feature in the next part of the EU’s
“taxonomy for sustainable activities”,
following a period of intense political
bargaining between the Commission
President, Ursula von der Leyen; the
French president, Emmanuel Macron;
and Germany’s new chancellor, Olaf
Scholz.
The rst two chapters of the sustain-
able taxonomy, the so-called ‘rst del-
egated act’, were passed on 9 Decem-
ber and came into force on 1 January
2022. But in a meeting of member
states on 29 November the project
nearly faltered.
The EU described nuclear as “a stable
energy source” needed “during the
transition to gas”. EU climate chief
Frans Timmermans also acknowl-
edged “nuclear and transition gas play
a role in the energy transition”, but
stressed that this “does not make them
green”.
An EU diplomat, speaking anony-
mously, explained to EUobserver that
a French-led group of 13 member states
tried to block the rst list “out of prin-
ciple” because the commission had not
agreed to include nuclear and gas in
the green taxonomy.
France and Finland pushed for nucle-
ar to be “fully part of the taxonomy”.
Ten other mainly eastern European
countries want gas included. Sweden
joined the group because the new rules
endanger its forestry sector.
Sebastien Godinot, a senior econo-
mist at WWF and member of the EU’s
Sustainable Finance Platform, said:
“The commission must deliver a sci-
ence-based taxonomy regulation that
excludes fossil gas, nuclear, and fac-
tory farming. Otherwise, the credibil-
ity of the taxonomy is ruined.”
Some argue the Commission may
have no choice but to compromise
with regards gas and nuclear – sup-
porting member states on one side,
and countries opposing these on the
other – while also being mindful that
investors and experts from its Sustain-
able Finance Platform will reject a
system containing contradictory po-
litical concessions.
Institutional investors have already
signalled they want a taxonomy based
on science, not political compromise.
Finland’s long-delayed Olkiluoto 3
(OL3) nuclear reactor has started pow-
ering up and will start producing elec-
tricity at the end of this month, some
12 years later than originally sched-
uled. Regular electricity production is
scheduled to begin in June.
The Nordic country’s nuclear safety
authority, STUK, gave permission last
month “for making the reactor critical
and conducting low power tests,” Finn-
ish electricity producer TVO said in a
statement. Construction of the 1600
MWe EPR began in 2005. Completion
of the reactor was originally scheduled
for 2009 but the project has had various
delays and setbacks.
Other EPR builds in France and the
UK have also been beset with delays,
with Hinkley Point in southwest
England pushing back its planned
electricity production by half a year
to mid-2026.
OL3 was built under a xed-price
turnkey contract by a consortium of
Areva and Siemens who have joint li-
ability for the contractual obligations
until the end of the guarantee period of
the unit.
Once low-power tests are completed,
the reactors power will be gradually
increased and further commissioning
tests conducted. STUK will oversee the
most signicant tests on site and check
the results of the commissioning tests.
During the power tests, permits issued
by STUK are required for power levels
of 5 per cent, 30 per cent and 60 per
cent. Electricity production starts at a
power level of 30 per cent.
Olkiluoto 3, which will run alongside
two existing reactors at Eurajoki on the
west coast, was the rst nuclear power
station to be procured in Europe after
the 1986 Chernobyl disaster.
“We are now moving step-by-step
with a safety-rst attitude towards the
moment we have waited for a long
time,” said TVO Senior Vice President
for Electricity Production Marjo Mus-
tonen. “The preconditions for the start-
up of the reactor have been fullled,
and soon we will be able to realise our
promises on Finland’s greatest act for
the climate.”
STUK said the preconditions for
criticality and low-power tests have
been met and the commissioning tests
performed before rst criticality show
that the plant operates as planned. It
noted the commissioning tests also
included re-tests carried out after mod-
ications were made to certain plant
systems.
The nal go-ahead came as the Min-
istry of Economic Affairs and Employ-
ment (TEM) announced it is launching
legislative preparations aimed at a
comprehensive reform of the country’s
Nuclear Energy Act. It said the future
use of nuclear energy – including new
technologies such as small modular
reactors – requires “appropriate and
up-to-date legislation”.
The revised draft legislation is ex-
pected to be submitted for consultation
during 2024. The government’s pro
-
posal to Parliament is due at the end of
the next parliamentary term, with the
law entering into force in 2028.
Headline News
Nuclear and gas still not seen as
Nuclear and gas still not seen as
“green” by EU climate chief
“green” by EU climate chief
Finland’s OL3 prepares to start-up, 12 years late
Finland’s OL3 prepares to start-up, 12 years late
Revised TEN-E rules
Revised TEN-E rules
will boost hydrogen
will boost hydrogen
Skrekas says the national
climate law is of “historical
importance”
n New EU rules for cross-border energy infrastructure
n IEA calls for more ambitious and concrete hydrogen policy efforts
THE ENERGY INDUSTRY TIMES - JANUARY 2022
3
Middle East & North Africa
ﺎـــــــــــــــــــﻴﻘﻳﺮﻓﺍ ﻝﺎـــــــــــــــــــﻤﺷﻭ ﻂــــــــــــــــــــﺳﻭﻷﺍ ﻕﺮــــــــــــــــــــﺸﻟ
M
ﺔﻴﺴﻤﺸﻟا ﺔﻗﺎﻄﻟا تﺎﻋﺎﻨﺼﻟ ﻂﺳوﻻا قﺮﺸﻟا ﺔﻴﻌﻤﺟ
Middle East Solar Industry Association
Empowering Solar across the Middle East
MIB Media.pdf 2 11/11/21 9:12 AM
21
st
-23
rd
JUNE
LANDMARK CENTRE, LAGOS
Conneccng the Nigerian Uclices Industry
Digiczacon. Sustainability. Opcmizacon.
POWER & WATER
NIGERIA 2022
THE ENERGY INDUSTRY TIMES - JANUARY 2022
7
Europe News
Janet Wood
The European Bank for Reconstruc-
tion and Development (EBRD) is to
lend Poland €38.9 million to build two
wind farms, Grajewo and Sulmierzyce,
totalling 63.1 MW. The other funder is
DNB ASA, Norway’s largest nancial
services group. Denmark’s export
credit fund is providing guarantees.
Poland’s transition to low-carbon
generation is gaining momentum, as it
aims to increase the renewable propor-
tion of its nal energy consumption
from 12.2 per cent at the end of 2019
to 23 per cent by 2030.
The next six months are expected to
see major contracts signed for the 1.2
GW Baltic Power offshore wind farm,
which is due to be completed in 2026,
according to its owner, a joint venture
between Poland’s PKN ORLEN and
Canadian Northland Power. “Key con-
tracts for the project will be signed
within the next six months, and the key
contractors will begin selecting and
working with new partners, including
local suppliers,” said Jarosław Broda,
President of the Baltic Power Manage-
ment Board. Almost 600 representa-
tives of 369 companies and institutions
attended a supply chain meeting at the
start of December, the developers said.
The European Commission has al-
ready given Poland State Aid clearance
to continue an existing scheme to sup-
port electricity production from renew-
able sources, who receive a variable
premium on top of the market price.
The measure will continue for the pe-
riod 2022-2027, and the European
Commission said, “the aid is necessary
to further develop energy generation
from renewable sources and to help
Poland meet its environmental targets,
set at European and national level”.
New companies in the market include
Eni SPA, which signed an agreement
with Copenhagen Infrastructure Part-
ners to extend their existing offshore
wind partnership to the Polish seas.
The Polish Energy Regulatory Ofce
(ERO) has also offered Contracts for
Difference to 5.9 GW of wind capac-
ity, some of which could be opera-
tional by 2025. They include the 1 GW
Baltica 3 and 1.5 GW Baltica 2 offshore
projects, developed by Ørsted and
PGE, and to the 350 MW FEW Baltic
II offshore project, developed by Baltic
Trade and RWE subsidiary Invest Sp.
z o. o., the 370 MW B&C-Wind proj-
ect developed by Ocean Winds, Equi-
nor and Polenergia’s Bałtyk II and
Bałtyk III projects with a combined
capacity of 1440 MW, and the 1.2 GW
Baltic Power project developed by
PKN Orlen and Northland Power.
Two more CfD auctions, each for 2.5
GW, are planned in 2025 and 2027.
Vattenfall AB has taken the nal in-
vestment decision on Denmark’s 344
MW Vesterhav Syd and Vesterhav
Nord offshore wind farms. Now the
Danish government wants to add up
to 3 GW of new offshore wind capac-
ity to be developed before 2030. The
plans were published in the Finance
Act 2022, with the rst tender for 2
GW of offshore wind capacity before
2030.
Currently, Denmark plans to add up
to 7.2 GW of offshore wind capacity
by 2030. It wants to develop an ‘en-
ergy island’ in the North Sea to host
more offshore wind connections by
2040.Recently the Danish Minister of
Climate, Energy and Utilities, Dan
Jørgensen, and the Belgian Minister
of Energy, Tinne van der Straeten,
signed a Memorandum of Agreement
to establish an offshore grid connec-
tion between Denmark and Germany,
including the planned energy island.
Meanwhile, the CO
2
storage project
known as Project Greensand has won
€26 million from the Danish Energy
Agency. “Carbon capture storage is
one of the steps needed to reach the
ambitious climate goals in Denmark,
and we as a consortium are very proud
to be allowed to contribute to that
through this project,” said David
Bucknall, Chief Executive of Project
Greensand consortium leader INEOS
Energy.
The European Commission’s newly
published Hydrogen and Decar-
bonised Gas Package aims for an EU
market for hydrogen by 2030.
Executive Vice-President for the Eu-
ropean Green Deal, Frans Timmer-
mans, said: “Europe needs to turn the
page on fossil fuels and move to clean-
er energy sources. This includes re-
placing fossil gas with renewable and
low carbon gases, like hydrogen. To-
day, we are proposing the rules to en-
able this transition and build the nec-
essary markets, networks and
infrastructure.”
The new rules will ease tariffs and
allow low-carbon gases to access the
existing gas grid. They also create a
certication system.
The EU sees an important role for
hydrogen in decarbonisation. To help
deliver its Hydrogen Strategy it set up
a European Clean Hydrogen Alliance,
which has now announced a pipeline
of over 750 European industrial hydro-
gen projects.
Among them, BP is planning a new
production facility in the UK, HyGreen
Teesside, which could deliver up to 500
MW of hydrogen production by 2030.
The UK also plans a £9.4 million
($12.7 million) hydrogen storage and
production facility at Whitelee, its larg-
est onshore windfarm.
In Belgium, Engie and Equinor have
announced the H2BE project to pro-
duce hydrogen from natural gas, with
gas transmission system operator
Fluxys.
In Spain, a joint-venture between
Iberdrola and H2 Green Steel plans to
build a €2.3 billion 1 GW electrolyser.
The Republic of Ireland is ready to
bring forward several new gas red
power plants over the next decade.
Minister for the Environment Eamon
Ryan will layout a policy to build
2 GW of gas generation to supplement
and act as backup for wind energy.
The policy would likely see between
four and seven new gas red plants.
The new gas plant would be in ad-
dition to about 15 GW in the form of
offshore and onshore wind farms and
solar farms. With the closure of the
coal red Moneypoint station and
other fossil fuel plants, the overall
volume of gas being used will remain
almost at current levels.
The Republic of Ireland expects to
see electricity demand increase over
the next decade, including for major
new data centres. In addition, it is plan-
ning on electrication of the transport
eet as well as more reliance on elec-
tricity for home heating.
The Commission for the Regulation
of Utilities said that “additional gas
red generation is vital for the success-
ful delivery of Ireland’s 2030 renew-
able electricity and climate targets”.
The Republic will also invest in in-
terconnection to connect it directly to
the EU’s internal electricity market
(IEM), of which it remains a member
although it is currently only linked via
the UK, which departed the IEM when
it left the European Union.
Janet Wood
The UK has opened its fourth renew-
ables tender, with Contracts for Differ-
ence (CfD) on offer for 12 GW of ca-
pacity – more than the previous three
rounds combined. UK energy regula-
tor Ofgem is also set to hold a third
investment round for interconnectors
next year, aiming to bring connections
between Great Britain and its neigh-
bours to at least 18 GW. But the major
investment in new capacity for the next
decade is being made as the UK’s con-
sumers face an energy crisis, with
sharply rising energy bills this winter.
The CfD auction will support major
offshore wind development including
oating offshore wind, along with
tidal stream projects and other emerg-
ing technologies. The allocation round
will close on 14 January 2022 and the
results are expected in late spring. It is
a major step towards delivering the
government’s plan for 40 GW of off-
shore wind by 2030.
Launching the auction, Kwasi
Kwarteng, Secretary of State at the
Department for Business, Energy and
Industrial Strategy, said: “Our biggest
ever renewables auction opening today
will solidify the UK’s role as a world-
leader in renewable electricity, while
backing new, future-proof industries
across the country to create new jobs.”
RenewableUK CEO Dan McGrail
said: “More than 16 GW of wind could
be ready to compete and over 23 GW
of renewables overall. We could see
investment of over £ 20 billion in this
round”.
Britain currently has 7.4 GW of elec-
tricity interconnectors with Ireland,
France, Belgium, the Netherlands and
Norway. A new investment round in
the middle of 2022 will target intercon-
nectors that can connect by 2030. “Our
next investment round for interconnec-
tors will bring forward the investment
we need, creating green jobs and un-
leashing the full potential of the UK’s
world leading offshore wind industry,
while also protecting customers by
capping costs,” said Ofgem’s Net-
works Director Akshay Kaul.
The major investment plans came as
rising gas prices and balancing costs
have caught out two dozen energy sup-
pliers, which have gone out of busi-
ness. Ofgem has been blamed for al-
lowing often thinly capitalised and
poorly hedged companies to operate in
a bid to boost competition.
Energy UK Chief Executive Emma
Pinchbeck said: “The industry has long
been calling for a more sustainable
regulatory and policy environment –
not only to avoid situations like the
present one, but because suppliers need
to drive the innovation in products and
services to help customers get the best
of the green energy transition.”
Kwasi Kwarteng said: “By generat-
ing more renewable energy in the UK,
we can ensure greater energy indepen-
dence by moving away from volatile
global fossil fuel prices, all while driv-
ing down the cost of new energy.”
Poland funds
Poland funds
green ambitions
green ambitions
UK energy crisis highlights
UK energy crisis highlights
renewables investment
renewables investment
EU’s hydrogen
EU’s hydrogen
industry hits 750
industry hits 750
projects
projects
Ireland to build gas power to
“cover transition”
Denmark invests in wind, carbon capture
n Financing in place for major onshore site n Two contracts for difference auctions by 2027
n Contracts for Difference for renewables, open door for new
interconnectors
n Gas and system costs raise prices
Gas market dynamics put future of
East Mediterranean gas in question
Snam commits to hydrogen future, US
sets up clean energy ofce
Gary Lakes
The future of East Mediterranean gas
is under debate. The surge in gas pric-
es has brought speculation about the
future demand for gas in a world that
is planning to make an energy transi-
tion that will phase out fossil fuels by
2050. But what if this transition does
not go smoothly and the world nds
that it needs more gas and needs it for
a longer period of time than currently
envisaged?
Questions surrounding the future
global gas markets have been bandied
about since the coronavirus pandemic
brought deep cuts in demand for hy-
drocarbons, and they have been hang-
ing over the East Mediterranean like a
Sword of Damocles. The known gas
resources in the East Med have yet to
be developed fully and most of the re-
sources believed to exist in the region
have yet to be discovered.
For now, its appears that gas will be
in demand for at least the next three
decades after which the world is meant
to be operating at net zero carbon emis-
sions. The recent price increases in gas
and especially the situation between
the EU and Russia over gas supplies is
an example of a situation that could
repeatedly pop-up during the course of
the switch to renewable energies.
Egypt, which several years ago had
basically shut down its LNG exports
because of low prices, is now exporting
at full capacity – around 12 million
tons/year – in order to take advantage
of current high prices. Egypt’s gas in-
dustry is well developed and over the
last six years has received a signicant
production boost after the discovery of
the Zohr eld in 2015. Current gas
production in Egypt is between 6.5 and
7.0 billion ft
3
per day.
Since Zohr, Egypt has been promot-
ing itself as a regional energy hub, the
idea being that it would import gas
produced in Israel and Cyprus, and re-
export it as LNG or, as Cyprus, Israel
and Greece have been suggesting, ex-
port East Med gas through a 2000 km
subsea pipeline that would land in
Greece and carry on to Southeast and
Central Europe. Egyptian President
Abdel Fattah el Sisi has proposed that
this pipeline run across northern Egypt
as far as the Libyan border and cross
to Crete and then Greece from there.
The pipeline projects are viewed by
many as unlikely, especially in a cli-
mate where long-term gas projects,
especially pipelines, are being ques-
tioned as being worthy of investment.
Funding for hydrocarbon projects is
under close scrutiny and it is doubtful
that more gas pipeline projects will be
added to the existing list.
For the time being, it looks like fu-
ture East Med gas production that is
not distributed regionally will be ex-
ported through Egypt’s LNG facili-
ties. And, it remains to be seen if
global gas markets will warrant the
investment in exploration and devel-
opment of the gas resource targets
offshore Cyprus and Lebanon.
Israel already has gas resources esti-
mated at around 1 trillion m
3
. Produc-
tion from the Tamar eld is going to
meet domestic needs, as is some of the
gas from the giant Leviathan eld. But
Leviathan is also exporting to Egypt
for re-export. Further development of
Leviathan will depend on decisions yet
to be made by operator Chevron, the
US giant. Greece’s Energean is also
developing the Karish and Tanin elds
and that gas will be available for the
Israel market next year.
Meanwhile, the Israeli government
announced last month that it will halt
further offshore gas exploration and
shift attention to developing renewable
energies, with Energy Minister Karine
Elharrar saying: “Gas can wait.”
In Cyprus, gas has been waiting for
a long time. ExxonMobil launched
during Christmas week an appraisal
well for its January 2019 Glavcos-1
discovery well. Glavcos-2 is expected
to conrm the estimated 5-8 tcf gas
resource and lead to further explora-
tion. This is the rst well drilled off-
shore Cyprus by licensed companies
since the start of the coronavirus pan-
demic. Cyprus’ Aphrodite eld, with
a 4.5 tcf resource, was discovered in
December 2011 and still lies undevel-
oped. Prior to the pandemic, there had
been talk of plans to ship the gas to
Egypt via a subsea pipeline for re-
export as LNG. Chevron, which is also
operator for Aphrodite, has yet to de-
cide on that eld’s future.
What will become of Lebanon’s en-
ergy sector is anyone’s guess. One
obstacle after another has appeared
that has held the country back.
One licensing round has been com-
pleted and two blocks awarded, but a
well drilled by the Total/Eni/Novatek
group proved un-commercial and an-
other planned well was cancelled due
to the pandemic. In November, the
Lebanese Petroleum Authority an-
nounced a closing date of June 15,
2022, for its second licensing round.
This might prove successful, but the
nancial crisis, the internal politics,
and an ongoing maritime border dis-
pute with Israel might not allow the
round to be as successful as it could be
under different circumstances.
Gary Lakes
Keen to take a leading role in Europe’s
transition to clean energy, Italy’s Snam,
the largest gas pipeline operator in Eu-
rope, has committed some €23 billion
to investments in hydrogen infrastruc-
ture from now until 2030, the company
said in November.
The company has expressed its plan
to transport entirely decarbonised gas
– hydrogen and biomethane – through-
out Italy and to the rest of Europe by
2050, making Italy an important hub
for the transition away from fossil fu-
els. Snam has allocated 50 per cent of
its 2020-2024 budget of €7.4 billion to
replace and develop infrastructure that
is compatible with the movement and
storage of hydrogen. The company
already asserts that 70 per cent of its
pipeline network is capable of trans-
porting hydrogen.
In a talk unveiling the company’s plan
for the next decade, CEO Marco Al-
vera, who has written several books on
hydrogen, said in November that Snam
would “play a key role in a decisive
decade for the energy transition” with
the aim to seize new growth opportuni-
ties in Italy as well as internationally.
Alvera’s comments followed the pur-
chase of a 49.9 per cent stake in Eni’s
gas pipelines that carry Algerian gas
from North Africa to Italy. The pur-
chase was made for the purpose of
eventually transporting hydrogen and
green ammonia produced in Algeria to
Italy and other countries in Europe.
Snam will pay Eni €385 million for
nearly half ownership in the 2700 km
pipeline system that currently trans-
ports gas to Italy. Algeria supplies Ita-
ly with about 30 per cent of its annual
gas demand.
A vast solar power generation system
has been envisaged for North Africa
with the plan calling for electricity gen-
erated by the solar stations to be trans-
mitted to Europe. Current thinking
calls for solar power to be used to run
electrolysers that would create hydro-
gen gas and then possibly green am-
monia for export. Snam plans to invest
€3 billion to repurpose the pipeline.
Snam also plans to invest €12 billion
to upgrade its 33 000 km pipeline in
Italy. Furthermore, the company has
entered a partnership with Italian rm
De Nora that will build an electroly-
ser factory with a capacity to produce
1 GW for hydrogen conversion.
Another €5 billion will be invested
in energy storage by 2030 and develop-
ing an international green energy stor-
age platform. According to company
information, Snam’s storage facilities
are already capable of storing 100 per
cent hydrogen. Snam operates nine
storage sites across Italy and more than
41 000 km of pipelines in Italy, Greece,
France, Austria, the UK and the UAE.
Besides De Nora, Snam has entered
into a number of partnerships designed
to share expertise that will move the
hydrogen agenda forward. The com-
pany is working with railway operators
FS Italiane and Ferrovie Nord, traction
suppliers Alstom, energy and utility
suppliers Eni, A2A and Hera in order
to develop refuelling infrastructure
that will make hydrogen mobility by
rail possible in Italy. Snam is also work-
ing with industrial rms and power
generation companies like Tenaris and
Edison.
Meanwhile, the US has established
the New Ofce of Clean Energy Dem-
onstrations with funding amounting to
more than $20 billion. The ofce is
mandated to help deliver on US Presi-
dent Joe Biden’s climate agenda and
set up numerous clean energy pro-
grams across the US. Those projects
include clean hydrogen, carbon cap-
ture, grid-scale energy storage, small
modular reactors and other innovative
forms of clean energy production.
“Demonstration projects prove the
effectiveness of innovative technolo-
gies in real-world conditions at scale
in order to pave the way towards wide-
spread adoption and deployment,” the
Department of Energy said in a De-
cember 21 statement announcing the
establishment of the ofce, which was
made possible by Congress passing
the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law.
“The Ofce of Clean Energy Dem-
onstrations will move clean energy
technologies out of the lab and into
local and regional economies across
the country, proving the value of tech-
nologies that can deliver for communi-
ties, businesses and markets,” Jennifer
Granholm, Secretary of Energy, said in
the statement.
A large portion of the funding will
go towards project developing green
hydrogen. Some $9.5 billion is allo-
cated for establishing four regional
green hydrogen hubs plus manufac-
turing and recycling programmes, all
of which are meant to demonstrate and
commercialise the new technology.
The demonstrations are intended to
unlock millions and billions of dollars
in follow-on investment.
Many of the projects will be located
in rural and low-income regions that
have been targeted by Biden’s Justice
40 initiative which aims to deliver 40
per cent of clean energy investment
benets to disadvantaged communities
and those hardest hit by climate change.
According to the statement, the ofce
will “consistently engage environmen-
tal justice groups, labour, and commu-
nities to help shape program develop-
ment and execution.”
Hydrogen
Gas
The future of East Mediterranean gas is under debate as questions continue to cloud the future of
global gas markets.
n
Europe’s largest gas pipeline operator plans to transport decarbonised gas by 2050
n New US ofce commits $20 billion to fund clean energy demonstration projects
THE ENERGY INDUSTRY TIMES - JANUARY 2022
11
Fuel Watch
I
n 2018, the European Commis-
sion published its action plan on
nancing sustainable growth. It
set a strategy to attract investment in
sustainable activities, including
through the creation of a European
framework evaluating the sustain-
ability of various economic activi-
ties. Such a framework is known as a
‘taxonomy’.
On June 22, 2020, the Regulation
on the establishment of a framework
to facilitate sustainable investment
was published in the EU Ofcial
Journal. This regulation creates the
EU taxonomy, basing its sustainabil-
ity assessment on six objectives:
1. Climate change mitigation
2. Climate change adaptation
3. The sustainable use and protection
of water and marine resources
4. The transition to a circular
economy
5. Pollution prevention and control
6. The protection and restoration of
biodiversity and ecosystems.
To be labelled as sustainable, an
activity should substantially contrib-
ute to at least one of these objectives,
without doing signicant harm to
any of the ve others (“Do No Sig-
nicant Harm” principle, DNSH).
The activity also needs to full
technical screening criteria that are
developed by the Platform on Sus-
tainable Finance an expert group
composed of representatives from
the nancial sector, various indus-
tries, and NGOs and adopted in
delegated acts. Without these dele-
gated acts, the framework is an emp-
ty shell: to assess the sustainability
of their portfolios, investors and
companies need to assess the activi-
ties they nance, insure or conduct
against the technical criteria pub-
lished in the delegated acts.
A rst delegated act, covering the
two climate objectives and encom-
passing around 70 activities, was
published in the Ofcial Journal of
the EU on 9th December 2021. A
draft complementary delegated act
covering gas and nuclear energy was
scheduled for December 22, 2021,
and a delegated act covering objec-
tives 3 to 6 is expected in 2022.
But waste management is one
piece missing in the taxonomy. The
waste management sector can con-
tribute to at least three of these ob-
jectives (climate change mitigation,
circular economy and pollution pre-
vention) and has therefore been par-
tially covered by the rst delegated
act and by the rst draft of activities
proposed by the Platform for the sec-
ond delegated act.
The rst delegated act acknowl-
edges the contributions to climate
change mitigation that can be
achieved in the higher steps of the
waste hierarchy: material recovery
of non-hazardous waste, anaerobic
digestion of biowaste, composting.
At the lower end of the hierarchy, it
recognises the positive contribution
of landll gas capture in closed land-
lls. As for the activities to be cov-
ered in the next delegated act, the
Platform proposed to note the contri-
bution of material recovery (both
non-hazardous and hazardous waste)
and of phosphorus recovery from
sewage sludge to the transition to the
circular economy, and of hazardous
waste treatment to pollution preven-
tion and control. The lower end of
the waste hierarchy was also cov-
ered, with the inclusion of the reme-
diation of legally non-conforming
landlls and abandoned or illegal
dumps as contributing to pollution
prevention and control.
So far, the work accomplished on
the taxonomy has however over-
looked a cornerstone of sustainable
waste management: dealing with re-
sidual waste, the waste that despite
all efforts cannot be prevented, re-
used or recycled. Large disparities in
waste management systems still ex-
ist between EU Member States:
while some Member States like Ger-
many recycle 67 per cent of their
municipal waste and landll virtual-
ly none of it, others like Romania
landll 76 per cent and recycle 11
per cent of their municipal waste. In
2019 in Spain, 12 million tonnes of
municipal waste were landlled.
The EU’s best performers in waste
management combine a high level of
recycling with an appropriate level
of waste-to-energy (WtE) so that
non-sorted waste and residues from
sorting and recycling processes can
be safely treated and their energy re-
covered. In order to reach the 2035
targets of minimum 65 per cent recy-
cling and maximum 10 per cent
landlling of municipal waste, many
Member States that still rely heavily
on landlls will need investments in
all of the other levels of the waste hi-
erarchy. The taxonomy would be an
ideal framework to provide investors
and public authorities with clear cri-
teria for sustainable residual waste
treatment activities. The move to-
wards more high quality recycling is
also leading to an increase in residu-
al, non-recyclable waste streams.
This waste must be treated in dedi-
cated installations, to avoid waste
transports to third countries where
environmentally sound management
is not guaranteed. This is the role of
waste-to-energy.
As acknowledged in the European
Commission’s Communication on
the role of Waste-to-Energy in the
Circular Economy, the WtE sector is
a key element of an integrated waste
management system and fully be-
longs in a circular economy as it
treats residual, non-recyclable waste.
It is therefore disappointing that nei-
ther the Commission nor the Plat-
form on Sustainable Finance have
proposed any guidance for the treat-
ment of the unrecyclable residual
waste to the countries that will need
to develop this aspect of their waste
management system.
The legal feasibility of including
WtE activities in the taxonomy has
been demonstrated by a legal analy-
sis from PwC (provided technical
criteria are developed and adopted).
In practice, the sector contributes to
the three objectives highlighted ear-
lier (1, 4 and 5).
With regard to climate change miti-
gation, WtE substitutes fossil fuel by
producing energy from non-recycla-
ble waste which would otherwise
have been landlled (emitting cli-
mate potent methane). As a signi-
cant part of the waste treated is bio-
genic, around half of the energy
produced is renewable. The combus-
tion process also allows the recovery
of metals embedded in the waste,
which leads to further greenhouse
gas emission savings. The mineral
part of bottom ash can be recovered
and used as aggregates, leading to
further emission savings.
Waste-to-Energy also helps to en-
able the transition to a circular econ-
omy, by treating non-recyclable
waste in the most sustainable way
possible, in line with the waste hier-
archy and best available techniques.
High-quality recycling can only be
achieved if there is an outlet for re-
jects from sorting and recycling fa-
cilities. This has been highlighted by
the recycling industry.
While the Platform proposal in-
cludes treatment of hazardous waste
for pollution prevention, there are
also contaminated wastes that are not
classied as hazardous but still need
thermal treatment to destroy the pol-
lutants and pathogens (e.g. POP-con-
taining wastes, some healthcare
waste). For these wastes, WtE plants
contribute to pollution prevention
and control: they allow the material
cycle to remain free of pollutants.
To be included in the taxonomy, an
activity must do no signicant harm.
With regards to WtE, this means that
installations are planned, designed
and operated so that they are in line
with the waste hierarchy, hence con-
sidering waste prevention and recy-
cling efforts. The Taxonomy Regula-
tion (Art. 17(1)(d)(i)) indicates that
an activity is signicantly harmful to
the transition to a circular economy
if this activity leads to a “signicant
increase in the generation, incinera-
tion or disposal of waste”. The Reg-
ulation does not dene further what
a “signicant increase” means and
on which level this should be inter-
preted (local, national, European).
As for additional capacities, the
WtE sector explicitly stated that new
investments should only happen in
well justied cases, in line with local
and national waste management
plans taking into account the EU
waste targets and potential waste
prevention and recycling measures.
The ongoing discussions on taxon-
omy are an ideal opportunity to de-
velop guidelines for the treatment of
non-recyclable waste in the most
sustainable way possible, in line
with the waste hierarchy and best
available techniques, while ensuring
that proper safeguards are in place.
Missing this opportunity will delay
investments in WtE when they are
needed, which will lead to incom-
plete waste management systems.
Many countries will lack outlets for
the rejects from their sorting and re-
cycling facilities and rely instead on
treatments lower in the hierarchy, or
send non-recyclable waste to regions
with lower environmental standards.
This will hamper the achievement of
the European waste management tar-
gets and, more importantly, be detri-
mental for both the circular economy
and the environment.
This is why CEWEP, together with
European associations representing
the whole waste management value
chain, calls on the European Com-
mission and the Platform on sustain-
able nance to develop technical
screening criteria for the inclusion of
WtE in the taxonomy.
Dr. Ella Stengler, is the Managing
Director at the Confederation of Eu-
ropean Waste-to-Energy Plants (CE-
WEP); Maxime Pernal is Policy Of-
cer, CEWEP.
The waste
management sector
can contribute to at
least three of the
six objectives of
the EU taxonomy
but the current
plan overlooks
a cornerstone of
sustainable waste
management:
dealing with residual
waste. Waste-to-
energy has a vital
role to play here,
say CEWEP’s
(Confederation of
European Waste-to-
Energy Plants)
Dr. Ella Stengler
and Maxime Pernal.
Waste-to-energy: the missing
Waste-to-energy: the missing
piece of the taxonomy puzzle
piece of the taxonomy puzzle
THE ENERGY INDUSTRY TIMES - JANUARY 2022
13
Industry Perspective
Pernal: the WtE sector is a key
element of an integrated waste
management system and fully
belongs in a circular economy
Dr Stengler: So far, the work accomplished on the taxonomy has
overlooked a cornerstone of sustainable waste management
E
liminating non-recyclable
plastic is one of the biggest
challenges facing the waste
management sector. According to
government data, in the UK alone in
2016 (the latest government data
available) the amount of plastic
waste going to landll was 53 400
tonnes. But although this remains a
signicant problem, technology
could soon be demonstrated that
would address the issue, while sup-
porting the UK’s plans to grow the
hydrogen economy.
Just over six months ago Peel
NRE, part of Peel L&P, announced
that it is planning to develop a waste
plastic-to-hydrogen facility at Rothe-
say Dock on the north bank of the
River Clyde, West Dunbartonshire.
The facility will be the second in the
UK to use pioneering technology de-
veloped by Powerhouse Energy
Group plc, after plans for a similar
facility at Peel NRE’s Protos site in
Cheshire were approved in 2019.
Like Protos, the latest £20 million
facility will take non-recyclable plas-
tics, destined for landll, incineration
or export overseas, and use them to
create a local source of sustainable
hydrogen. The hydrogen will be used
as a clean fuel for buses, cars and
HGVs, with plans for a linked hy-
drogen refuelling station on the site.
The project is one of a number of
low carbon “waste-to value projects”
the company is developing as part of
a clean energy portfolio that includes
renewables, i.e. wind, solar projects.
Peel NRE’s plastics-to-hydrogen
projects will play a signicant role in
the UK’s Hydrogen Strategy an-
nounced in August last year, when
the government said it will work
with industry to meet its ambition for
5 GW of low carbon hydrogen pro-
duction capacity by 2030. This is the
equivalent of replacing natural gas in
powering around 3 million UK
homes each year as well as powering
transport and businesses, particularly
heavy industry.
Richard Barker, Development Di-
rector at Peel NRE, said: “Plastic is
often demonised, but we have seen
how essential it is in industries like
healthcare. We do need to recycle as
much of this plastic as possible and
also get as much value from unrecy-
clable, end-of-life plastic.”
While the company is working on
the disposal of several residual
waste projects, Barker says the key
focus is bringing forward the plastics
facility development at Protos. “It
has been a couple of years in gesta-
tion but we’ve rolled out a concept
that brings together various forms
of technology – some established,
some emerging such as the plastics-
to-hydrogen.”
Barker notes that the idea is to have
a grouping of technologies, that are
“symbiotic and co-located to benet
from each others’ presence. He ex-
plained: “The plastics park compris-
es two plastics recycling facilities
[PRFs] – one (PRF1) is a purely sort-
ing facility that will separate out var-
ious polymer types and at the end
produce recyclers that are suitable
for the next recycling stage (PRF2)
or to go off-site. PRF2 does some
additional sorting to improve the
quality of the recyclers that are cap-
tured. These then go through a series
of washing lines… so they are recov-
ered into their base polymer type to
eventually go back into plastics pro-
duction. The idea is then to use the
poorer quality feedstock that cannot
be recycled in the plastics-to-hydro-
gen facility.”
The plastics-to-hydrogen facility at
Protos can process around 13 500 t/
annum of plastics to produce about 2
t/day of hydrogen. It uses Power-
House Energy’s DMG (distributed
Modular Gasication) technology,
which is essentially a pyrolysis pro-
cess where the material is melted and
boiled so it becomes vapour. Gasi-
cation is carried out at around
1000°C with the help of an oxidising
agent but without introducing any
oxygen or air into the process. The
operation takes place in a slight vac-
uum but although there is a little air
in the chamber, the product is not be-
ing burned.
The temperature, oxidising agent
and the residence time of the gases in
the chamber are controlled to pro-
duce either hydrogen gas or a meth-
ane-rich gas. When looking to pro-
duce electricity, the methane content
would be increased so it can be
burned in a reciprocating gas engine.
According to PowerHouse Energy
the technique is a far cheaper way of
producing hydrogen than steam
methane reformation (SMR), which
is currently the only industrial scale
technique for hydrogen production.
The company says that its DMG has
a smaller footprint and is more ef-
cient than electrolysers, noting that
DMG vessels could be loaded on to
a lorry. It also noted that their small
size would make them easier and
faster to permit – taking in the order
of months as opposed to years.
The Protos site, which sits on about
1.8 acres (approx. 7300 m
2
), also
hosts a hydrogen fuelling station, so
arriving trucks could potentially be
refuelled with hydrogen. It is big
enough to refuel about 80 vehicles
and about 1 MW of electricity. This
is sufcient electricity to power the
facility and the plastics park, with
the surplus going to the local grid.
“By co-locating a refuelling sta-
tion, we can help to kick-start the in-
frastructure needed to support the
rollout of hydrogen vehicles which
will be an important part of our jour-
ney to net zero,” said Barker
The Dunbartonshire site will be
slightly bigger, sitting on a roughly
3 acres site due to a larger plastics
processing facility. “It’s more of a
standalone; it doesn’t have the bene-
t of a plastics park wrapped around
it, so will have to process more of its
own,” noted Barker. “But the [plas-
tics-to-hydrogen] units are the same
size.”
Hydrogen from the facility will be
shared between the refuelling station
and the local market. Barker noted:
“Glasgow city council is looking to
convert its diesel eet to hydrogen,
and has already gone some way to
doing that. So we would be com-
pressing the hydrogen and tankering
it out on trailers.”
The planning application for the
Dunbartonshire project has been sub-
mitted and is expected to be deter-
mined some time this year. “Beyond
that,” said Barker, “we’re unlikely to
be doing anything substantive until
we’re sure of the outcome of the rst
[Protos] project.”
Commenting on the schedule for
Protos, PowerHouse Energy stated:
“As a rst-of-a-kind project, Protos
is being designed to allow it to be
commissioned in stages. This mea-
sured approach will place the plant
gradually into full test, and subse-
quently, full operation. One of the
initial tests will be the thermal con-
version chamber (TCC) and syngas
production. Earlier in our delivery
schedule, this test will provide Pow-
erHouse Energy and investors alike,
great condence that a high quality
and consistent syngas product is able
to be produced.
“Following TCC and syngas pro-
duction we then test power genera-
tion, and nally hydrogen produc-
tion, before we declare that we are
complete and operational. This nal
announcement is forecast for 2023.”
Construction of front-end facilities
and site infrastructure is already un-
derway and the project is, as Barkers
puts it “top of everyone’s priority”.
Although still a work in progress,
Barker says lessons have already
been learned from Protos. “You’re
always learning with these projects.
For example, we’ve learned about
the front-end processing capacity but
once the [Protos] project is fully con-
structed and up and running, we’ll be
undertaking a review of the project.
So that’s why we wouldn’t want to
start too soon on the second project.”
These rst two projects are the start
of what is likely to be a long-term re-
lationship between Peel NRE and
PowerHouse Energy. The two com-
panies have signed a collaboration
agreement to develop 11 waste plas-
tic-to-hydrogen facilities across the
UK over the next few years, with the
option of exclusive rights for a total
of 70 facilities.
Commenting on where the addi-
tional facilities might be, Barker
said: “The locations depend on the
nature of the land surrounding the
various sites. What we’re looking for
is sites that are located either close to
the source of the feedstock or close
to the [hydrogen] end-user. Although
the economics will still work, there
are commercial benets from being
in those two areas. We will be using
some of our land but equally they
could be built on third-party land –
most likely close to industrial areas
and large cities, where people are.”
Barker says the aim is to roll-out
these projects “as rapidly as possible
after the rst one; hence the reason
for going into planning on the sec-
ond”. He concluded: “We have a
number of other sites that could po-
tentially be utilised, where we’ve got
existing waste management consent
in place, so we could just re-purpose
the site.”
THE ENERGY INDUSTRY TIMES - JANUARY 2022
15
Technology Focus
Making use of hard
to recycle plastics
could be one
way of reducing
plastic waste, while
supporting the UK’s
hydrogen strategy.
Junior Isles looks
at how Peel NRE
is progressing with
plans to roll-out
plastics-to-hydrogen
technology.
Hydrogen makes progress
Hydrogen makes progress
with plastics
with plastics
A tonne of hydrogen from a
truck full of waste
Computer generated image of the
Protos plastics-to-hydrogen facility
THE ENERGY INDUSTRY TIMES - JANUARY 2022
16
Final Word
D
espite the war on coal in the
drive to net zero, the end days
of the black stuff are still some
way off. Borrowing from Mark Twain
one might quip: ‘reports of its death
have been greatly exaggerated’.
Certainly, the recent annual coal re-
port from the International Energy
Agency (IEA) made sobering reading.
The Paris-based organisation said
global power generation from coal was
set to jump by 9 per cent in 2021 to an
all-time high of 10 350 TWh, after
falling in 2019 and 2020.
According to the IEA, rapid eco-
nomic recovery is driving global coal
power generation to a record high in
2021 and overall coal demand to a
potential all-time high as soon as
2022. It says the economic rebound
in 2021 has pushed up electricity
demand much faster than low-carbon
supplies can keep up. The steep rise
in natural gas prices also increased
demand for coal power by making it
more cost-competitive.
The IEA warned that the level of
coal use could remain at the historical
high for the next two years. As we
move into a new year, such unsettling
news underlines the urgent need for
policy action.
Commenting on the ndings, the
IEAs Executive Director Fatih Birol,
said: “Coal is the single largest source
of global carbon emissions, and this
years [2021] historically high level of
coal power generation is a worrying
sign of how far off track the world is
in its efforts to put emissions into de-
cline towards net zero. Without strong
and immediate actions by govern-
ments to tackle coal emissions – in a
way that is fair, affordable and secure
for those affected – we will have little
chance, if any at all, of limiting global
warming to 1.5°C.”
Coal’s comeback underlines the
challenge world leaders face in mak-
ing the transition to clean energy,
especially in countries like India and
China, which, according to the report,
account for two thirds of global coal
consumption. Notably, China and
India led calls that resulted in weak-
ened ambition to end coal red
power at the COP26 climate summit
in Glasgow. But although coal was
granted a stay of execution at the
summit, it is clear that it is living on
borrowed time.
“The climb-down on a global agree-
ment to phase-out coal made head-
lines, but the COP26 messaging was
clear enough: coal’s days are num-
bered. As a result, nance and insur-
ance costs for coal will climb even
higher. Alternatives to coal-based
power and industrial applications that
are both scalable and affordable will
take time to roll out. But a global
carbon market will eventually accel-
erate the competitiveness of low-
carbon solutions in both the power and
steel sectors. The consequences for
coal are clear,” said Wood Mackenzie
Research Director, Robin Grifn.
Meanwhile, nancial institutions
continue to pull back. Just last month
HSBC Holdings plc set out its policy
to phase-out the nancing of coal red
power and thermal coal mining by
2030 in EU and OECD markets, and
worldwide by 2040.
In recognition of the rapid decline
in coal emissions required for any
viable pathway to 1.5°C, the policy
will mean HSBC phasing out nance
to clients whose transition plans are
not compatible with the bank’s net
zero by 2050 target.
The thermal coal phase-out policy,
which will be reviewed annually based
on evolving science and internation-
ally recognised guidance, is a key part
of executing on HSBC’s October 2020
ambition to align its nanced emis-
sions – the greenhouse gas emissions
of its portfolio of clients – to net zero
by 2050 or sooner.
The policy includes short-term
targets to help drive measureable
results in advance of the phase-out
dates. A science-based nanced emis-
sions target will be published in 2022
to reduce emissions from coal red
power in line with a 1.5°C pathway.
HSBC stressed that given the nine-
year timetable to phase-out coal in EU/
OECD markets, new nance to clients
in these markets will be declined
where thermal coal makes up more
than 40 per cent of a client’s total
revenues (or more than 30 per cent of
total revenues by 2025), unless the
nance is explicitly for the purpose of
clean technology and infrastructure.
It noted, however: “HSBC is not
applying these criteria in non-EU/
OECD markets today, as we will
evaluate client transition plans accord-
ing to their alignment to HSBC’s net
zero by 2050 target and worldwide
coal phase-out date of 2040.”
Given the bank’s substantial foot-
print across Asia, with the region’s
heavy reliance on coal today and its
rapidly growing energy demand,
HSBC says it recognises it has a criti-
cal role to play in helping to nance
the region’s energy transition from
coal to clean energy. HSBC will expect
its clients to lay out credible transition
plans for the next two decades to di-
versify away from coal red power
production to clean energy, and from
coal mining to other raw materials,
including those vital to clean energy
technologies.
Group Chief Executive, Noel
Quinn, said: “We want to be at the
heart of nancing the energy transi-
tion, particularly in Asia. This is
where we can have the biggest impact
to help the world achieve its target of
limiting global warming to 1.5°C. We
have a long history and strong pres-
ence in many emerging markets that
are heavily reliant on coal for power
generation. We are committed to us-
ing our deep relationships to partner
with clients in those markets to help
them transition to cleaner, safer and
cheaper energy alternatives in the
coming decades.
“Tackling climate change is a stra-
tegic priority for HSBC, our investors
and our stakeholders.”
While Asia’s transition from coal is
essential if the world is to have any
hope of reversing climate change,
there are still fears that the climate
benets of record coal plant cancel-
lations in Asia will be lost if a planned
$358 billion expansion of Asian gas
infrastructure goes forward. Accord-
ing to a recent brieng from Global
Energy Monitor (GEM), there are
plans in the region for 285 GW of new
gas red power plants, 452 million
tonnes per annum (mtpa) of liqueed
natural gas (LNG) import capacity,
and 63 000 km of gas pipelines. This
expansion would double the region’s
gas power capacity and triple its
pipeline capacity, while increasing
the world’s 910 mtpa of LNG import
capacity by 50 per cent.
There is little doubt such gas expan-
sion undermines Asian countries’
pledges to achieve net zero emissions
by mid-century. According to GEM,
even if just half of the proposed gas
plants in Asia are built (143 of 285
GW) with an operating lifetime of 30
years, it will postpone the net zero
power system by decades.
“The coal bust is at a risk of becom-
ing a gas boom in Asia,” said Robert
Rozansky, GEM’s LNG research ana-
lyst. “Asia’s gas build-out would be a
$358 billion bet on assets that are – or
soon will be – uncompetitive against
ever cheaper renewable power.”
This may well be the case but there
will always be those willing to take
such risks – the countries that will
address their needs today and worry
about tomorrow when it comes. For
now, rumours of any imminent end to
coal power and fossil fuel may well be
premature but one thing is certain:
fossil fuel generation and net zero
targets are incompatible and ‘never the
twain shall meet’.
Never the twain shall meet
Junior Isles
Cartoon: jemsoar.com