www.teitimes.com
October 2020 • Volume 13 • No 6 • Published monthly • ISSN 1757-7365
THE ENERGY INDUSTRY TIMES is published by Man in Black Media • www.mibmedia.com • Editor-in-Chief: Junior Isles • For all enquiries email: enquiries@teitimes.com
Special Project
Supplement
Mirror to the
future
HYFLEXPOWER aims to
demonstrate a world rst for
hydrogen.
GE Digital’s Colin Parris explains the
benets of digital twins and offers a
glimpse of what’s to come. Page 14
News In Brief
Urgent scale-up of clean
energy technologies needed
A major effort to develop and
deploy clean energy technologies
worldwide is urgently needed,
according to a new report by the
International Energy Agency.
Page 2
FERC to exploit value of
distributed energy resources
New rules approved by the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission
look set to bring the value of
distributed energy resources to the
wholesale electricity system and to
end-consumers in the US.
Page 4
US tensions impact China
power sector
Tension between the US and China
is having an indirect impact on
China’s power sector.
Page 5
HVDC boosts cross-border
offshore wind expansion
A recent development in high
voltage direct current technology
will help Europe better utilise
offshore wind, thereby helping
the bloc to achieve its climate
ambitions.
Page 7
Siemens Energy focuses on
protability as it starts “new
era”
Siemens Energy’s listing on the
Frankfurt Stock Exchange marks the
start of a “new, important era” for
the company and a clear focus on
protability.
Page 9
Fuel Watch: Hydrogen
Germany is to study the
development of a hydrogen supply
chain with Australia, and plans to
cooperate with France on hydrogen
research and production.
Page 12
A random walk through the
energy transition
Aspen Technology discusses the
technologies that will help oil & gas
majors in what will be a difcult
transition for them to make.
Page 13
Technology Focus: Smart
meters pave the way
Octopus Energy has developed a
new cloud-based energy platform
based on smart tariffs that is
designed to deliver a smarter energy
system.
Page 15
Advertise
advertising@teitimes.com
Subscribe
subscriptions@teitimes.com
or call +44 208 523 2573
Changes are needed to Europe’s emissions trading scheme if it is to full its new target for
carbon emissions. Junior Isles
Trump administration continues pushback
on Democrat clean energy stance
THE ENERGY INDUSTRY
TIMES
Final Word
Don’t get lost down a
rabbit hole in pursuit of
net zero, warns Junior Isles.
Page 16
There has been a growing number of
calls for the European Commission to
upgrade it Emissions Trading Scheme
(ETS) following the announcement of
the bloc’s proposal to increase its cli-
mate commitment and reduce carbon
dioxide emissions by at least 55 per
cent by 2030 relative to 1990 levels.
This is the level necessary to put the
EU on a path to climate neutrality by
2050.
A new report by the European Court
of Auditors (ECA) called for the Com-
mission to update its procedure for
targeting free allowances to reect the
Paris Agreement and recent develop-
ments. It noted that free allowances
still make up over 40 per cent of all
available allowances under the EU’s
‘cap and trade’ ETS, and that these
free allowances, distributed to indus-
try, aviation and, in some Member
States, the electricity sector, were not
well targeted.
The EU’s ETS uses free allowances
to discourage EU businesses from
transferring activity to non-EU coun-
tries with lower environmental stan-
dards, as this would reduce invest-
ment in the EU and increase global
emissions. This is known as carbon
leakage.
The industrial and aviation sectors
benet from free allowances, unlike
most operators in the power sector, as
it is considered that they can pass on
carbon costs directly to the consumer.
However, in the eight Member States
with a GDP per capita below 60 per
cent of the EU average, the power sec-
tor received free allowances to enable
modernisation to take place. Accord-
ing to the ECA, this has signicantly
reduced the speed of decarbonisation
in the power sector.
“Free allowances should be targeted
at those industrial sectors least able to
pass on carbon costs to consumers,”
said Samo Jereb, the ECA Member
leading the audit. “However, this is
not the case. Sectors representing over
90 per cent of industrial emissions are
equally considered at risk of carbon
leakage and benet from continuous
high rates of free allowances. Unless
the allocation of free allowances is
better targeted, the EU will not reap
the full benets the ETS could have on
decarbonisation and public nances.”
The auditors acknowledge, howev-
er, that the Commission has tightened
rules affecting the power sector for
2021-2030.
There were also calls to extend the
ETS to heating. EGEC Geothermal
said it is absolutely crucial the Euro-
pean Commission recognises the im-
portance of decarbonising heating and
make this a priority area for action.
The heating and cooling sector rep-
resents 51 per cent of nal energy con-
sumption in Europe and approximate-
ly 27 per cent of EU carbon emissions.
EGEC Geothermal noted that 80 per
Continued on Page 2
Trump administration has nalised its
weakening of an Obama-era rule
aimed at reducing polluted wastewater
from coal burning power plants that
has contaminated streams, lakes and
underground aquifers.
Utilities are expected to save $140
million annually under the changes,
which Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) Administrator An-
drew Wheeler said in a statement
would protect industry jobs in part by
using a phased-in approach to reduc-
ing pollution.
But environmentalists and a former
EPA ofcials warned the move will
harm public health and result in hun-
dreds of thousands of pounds of pol-
lutants annually contaminating water
bodies.
The new rule introduced at the end
of August largely exempts coal plants
that will retire or switch to burning
natural gas by 2028.
It is the latest in a string of regula-
tory rollbacks for coal power under
US President Donald Trump – actions
that have failed to turn around the in-
dustry’s decline amid competition
from cheap natural gas and renewable
energy.
The Democrats’ clean energy vision
has come under re since Trump took
ofce in 2016 and has become a point
of political debate with the Califor-
nian forest res that have caused
blackouts in the Democrat-run state.
The American Energy Alliance said
California was a preview of what
Democratic presidential candidate
Joe Biden’s plan would do to the rest
of country, stating that the blackout
stemmed from a “severe heatwave
and without the wind blowing and the
sun shining”.
“Residents are asked to conserve
electricity to keep the power on –
something most other states do not
have to endure,” the Alliance noted.
“This should be a warning to America
about the risks of Biden’s Clean En-
ergy Standard that would require 62
per cent of our electricity which is
now produced from natural gas and
coal to come from non-carbon sourc-
es, which would primarily be wind
and solar power.”
Renewables currently generate
about 15 per cent of America’s power.
Biden has specically pledged to
eliminate carbon emissions from the
power grid by 2035.
“The whole thing is a kind of fairy-
tale that assumes you can run the elec-
tric grid on fairy dust,” said Myron
Ebell, Director of Competitive Enter-
prise Institute’s Center for Energy and
Environment. “What the Green New
Deal and the Biden Energy Plan have
not gured out is where the electricity
is going to come from when the wind
isn’t blowing and the sun has been
down for a day.”
Meanwhile, Wyoming’s governor is
promoting a Trump administration
study that says capturing carbon diox-
ide emitted by coal red power plants
would be an economical way to cur-
tail pollution. PaciCorp, the utility
that owns the plants and wants to shift
away from the fossil fuel in favour of
wind and solar energy, has questioned
the ndings.
The study released in late August
says adding carbon capture at the four
plants would reduce carbon dioxide
emissions 37 per cent, cost electricity
customers 10 per cent less and pro-
duce up to ve times more jobs com-
pared with PaciCorp’s plans to shift
to clean energy.
PaciCorp took issue with the
study, saying it ignored “everything
associated with how a utility’s costs
ow into rates” and made a range of
assumptions.
“As PaciCorp continues to exam-
ine the study’s assumptions and cal-
culations to properly evaluate its
conclusions, we’re nding many of
those conclusions are simply wrong,”
David Eskelsen, a spokesman for
PaciCorp subsidiary Rocky Moun-
tain Power, said in a statement.
Calls for changes
Calls for changes
to ETS as Europe
to ETS as Europe
raises Paris ambition
raises Paris ambition
European Commissioner Ursula von der Leyen pushing for stronger emissions target
THE ENERGY INDUSTRY TIMES - OCTOBER 2020
3
www.teitimes.com
THE ENERGY INDUSTRY
TIMES
subscribe today
The Energy Industry Times is the only publication that
covers global news related to the power and energy
sector in a newspaper style and format whose
uniqueness is recognised by our readers.
As a paid subsciber you will gain full access to our online
news desk.
You will also no longer have to wait for the printed edi-
tion; receive it by PDF “hot off the press” or download it
online.
To subscribe, email subscriptions@teitimes.com or visit
www.teitimes.com
To guarantee receiving your monthly copy of the award
winning newspaper, you need to subscribe today
28 - 30 OCTOBER | #RUKGOW20
Events.RenewableUK.com/GOW20
Network
with 4000+
global offshore
wind experts
(without even getting off the sofa)
JOIN EUROPE’S
LARGEST VIRTUAL
OFFSHORE WIND
EVENT FROM
ONLY £150
Partners |
GLOBAL
OFFSHORE
WIND
THE ENERGY INDUSTRY TIMES - OCTOBER 2020
5
Asia News
Syed Ali
Tension between the US and China is
having an indirect impact on China’s
power sector.
Last month Wood Mackenzie re-
ported that gas power plants are strug-
gling to stay aoat as they face mount-
ing pressure from lower tariffs and the
ongoing trade war.
The Chinese government has been
reducing regulated gas red power
tariffs by 16 per cent to 28 per cent in
key provincial markets since June
2020. This is driven by political goals
of reducing end-user power prices and
improving manufacturing competi-
tiveness in the wake of trade tensions
with the US. Power tariffs for indus-
tries in China have fallen 25 per cent
in the last three years.
Gas red power tariffs at some
higher-utilised gas plants (>3500
hours per year) have even been low-
ered to a level similar to the much
cheaper coal red power. This ‘coal
parity’ initiative has a huge impact on
the economics of the current gas eet
and investment decisions for new
units.
Wood Mackenzie principal consul-
tant Frank Yu said: “The new regula-
tions will cause at least a 5 to 6 per-
centage point decline in the already
poor margins of gas power plants.
Delivered fuel costs at most gas pow-
er plants have only declined by 10 per
cent to 13 per cent, while revenues
have been cut by 16 per cent to 28 per
cent due to the new regulations. Most
projects are now loss-making or bare-
ly breaking even.”
Despite strong demand growth for
clean power, government policies
have been moving to limit gas power
development and support energy
security goals.
By 2025, around 8 billion m
3
or 17
per cent of gas demand for power gen-
eration in four coastal markets could
be at risk due to fewer new builds and
lower utilisation hours as a result of
poor economics. Wood Mackenzie
estimates around 7 GW out of 17 GW
of gas red power projects scheduled
for commissioning between 2022 and
2025, to be at risk of delays or cancel-
lations. These projects are located in
the coastal provinces of Zhejiang,
Jiangsu, Shanghai, and Guangdong.
Worries over energy security and
increasing geopolitical uncertainties,
has also seen the country switch from
US nuclear power technology to a
domestically developed alternative,
according to a recent report in the
South China Morning Post.
The AP1000 technology, designed
by America’s Westinghouse Electric
Company, was once the basis of Chi-
na’s third-generation nuclear power,
but now the country has more third-
generation reactors based on its own
Hualong One technology under con-
struction or approved, than it does
AP1000 reactors.
Meanwhile, four units approved last
year and another four nuclear reactors
approved on September 2 – in Hainan
and Zhejiang province – will also use
Hualong One technology.
Wang Yingsu, Secretary General of
the nuclear power branch of the China
Electric Power Promotion Council
said that technology localisation, de-
velopment of indigenous nuclear
power technology, and the capability
of constructing and operating nuclear
power plants independently had al-
ways been China’s goal since it began
its nuclear power journey more than
50 years ago.
“More power plants will choose
Hualong One in the future because it’s
China’s independently developed
technology and it’s as good as
AP1000,” Wang commented. How-
ever, he added: “AP1000 is Westing-
house’s technology and we might be
controlled by them if we want to build
the reactors, sell and export to other
countries.”
When the US sanctioned China Gen-
eral Nuclear Power Group (CGN) and
three of its subsidiaries in 2019 over
accusations of stealing US technology
for military use, CGN said the impact
on the company was “controllable”.
Xu Kan, assistant general manager
of Qinshan Nuclear Power Plant, a
subsidiary of China National Nuclear
Corporation (CNNC), said last year
that CNNC began investigating the
possible impact of geopolitical factors
on its 21 reactors in 2018.
Japan is set to draft new rules and cre-
tae a support framework in a drive to
construct offshore wind projects at 30
locations by the end of the next decade.
Under the plans, three or four projects
would be built per year with a total
generation capacity of 1 GW, from the
scal year beginning in April 2021
until 2030-2031. By the end of the de-
cade, a total of 10 GW of potential
generation sites are expected to be
identied for further development, ac-
cording to data and analytics company
GlobalData.
Japan’s offshore wind sector is al-
ready proving attractive to investors.
In September Equinor, Jera and J-
Power announced a partnership to
enter a joint bid agreement prior to
Japan’s upcoming Round 1 offshore
wind auction.
The three companies will jointly
evaluate and work towards submitting
a joint bid in the Round 1 auction once
the Japanese government ofcially
opens what will be country’s rst off-
shore wind auction.
The Japanese government has dedi-
cated Yurihonjo and Noshiro, two ar-
eas offshore the northern Japanese
prefecture of Akita, as promotional
zones for offshore wind, each repre-
senting an area for bottom-xed off-
shore wind farms of approximately
400 MW and 700 MW, respectively.
The upcoming auction is anticipated
to start within the next months, with
bid submission taking place six months
after the auction opens. Once the auc-
tion is closed, the results are expected
to be announced towards the end of
2021. Potential wind farms would then
tentatively be operative post 2025.
Also in September, Spanish energy
company Iberdrola reached an agree-
ment with Macquarie’s Green Invest-
ment Group (GIG) for the acquisition
of 100 per cent of Japanese developer
Acacia Renewables. Acacia Renew-
ables currently has two offshore wind
farms in development, with a com-
bined power of 1.2 GW, which could
be operational by 2028.
It also has four other projects in its
pipeline, with a total generating capac-
ity of 2.1 GW. Three of the six projects
will use oating foundations. Iber-
drola will hold an equal share in the
six projects alongside GIG, and the
partners will develop the portfolio.
The acquisition of this local renew-
able developer gives Iberdrola the op-
portunity to position itself in the Japa-
nese offshore wind sector, which is at
an early stage of development.
Installed offshore wind capacity in
Japan is currently around 70 MW, but
the forecasts indicate that the market
will reach 10 GW of installed capacity
in 2030, and up to 37 GW in 2050.
US tensions impact
US tensions impact
China power sector
China power sector
Japan prepares
offshore wind
blueprint
n Government reduces gas red power tariffs n US reactors no longer in favour
THE ENERGY INDUSTRY TIMES - OCTOBER 2020
Special Project Supplement
Flexing the power of
hydrogen
In May this year, Siemens Energy together with its consortium partners announced a project that will see a
dry low emissions gas turbine burn up to 100 per cent hydrogen produced from renewable energy. Known as
HYFLEXPOWER, the project will be the rst to achieve this at an actual industrial site. Junior Isles
see a consortium made up of Engie
Solutions, Siemens Energy, Centrax,
Arttic, German Aerospace Center
(DLR) and four European universi-
ties implement a project funded by
the European Commission under the
Horizon 2020 Framework Program
for Research and Innovation (Grant
Agreement 884229).
The project, which is being hailed as
the world’s very rst industrial-scale
power-to-X-to-power demonstrator
with an advanced hydrogen turbine,
will be launched at Smurt Kappa
PRF’s site in Saillat-sur-Vienne,
France. Here Engie Solutions oper-
ates a combined heat and power
(CHP) facility, which produces 12
MWe of electricity and 20 MWth of
heat as steam for Smurt Kappa’s re-
cycled paper manufacturing process.
The aim of the HYFLEXPOWER
project is to prove that hydrogen can
be produced and stored from renew-
able electricity and then mixed, up to
100 per cent by volume, with the
natural gas currently used at the CHP
plant. This means it will be a com-
pletely dispatchable CHP unit, even if
insufcient hydrogen is available.
Blending natural gas and hydrogen
can substantially lower carbon emis-
sions. The EU is closing coal red
plants and has made renewables a
central pillar of achieving carbon
neutrality by 2050 but in the long
term it will also have to remove car-
bon from its gas red plant. Dis-
placement of natural gas fuel with
hydrogen is a viable means of en-
abling carbon neutral power plant
operation as hydrogen combustion
produces no CO
2
.
Notably, when operating on 100 per
cent green hydrogen the SGT-400 in
baseload operation at the Smurt
Kappa site would save up to 65 000
tons of CO
2
per year.
Hydrogen fuel blending not only
lowers CO
2
emissions, it also ensures
that the gas turbines can participate in
electricity storage and re-electrica-
tion. Hydrogen can serve as a chemi-
cal storage vehicle by being produced
through electrolysis of water during
times of excess renewable energy
generation, and then used to fuel gas
turbines or sold to other industries
Ertan Yilmaz, Strategy Manager for
Gas Turbine Technology at Siemens
Energy, and coordinator for the HY-
FLEXPOWER project commented:
“The project is not only a world rst
T
he potential of hydrogen as an
energy vector – capable of
decarbonising heat, industry,
power and transport – has long been
recognised. But it is only during the
last couple of years, with the
plummeting cost of electricity from
wind and solar, that developments
have really escalated.
Using renewable electricity to de-
carbonise energy across all sectors
has huge environmental and business
benets. And with the rst signicant
projects now taking shape, this so-
called ‘sector coupling’ – bringing
renewable energy from the power
sector into the other sectors to thereby
decarbonise the entire energy system
– is nally set to play a crucial part in
the energy transition.
It is an area that Siemens Energy
believes has enormous potential and
over the last few years has therefore
been ramping up investment in power-
to-X (P2X) technologies that enable
sector coupling.
In May this year, the company un-
veiled a signicant venture known as
HYFLEXPOWER, a project that will
play a key role in decarbonising its
eet of gas turbines. Siemens Energy
notes that although the power sector
has decarbonised signicantly by
switching from coal to gas and using
renewables, there has not been the
same level of focus on using hydro-
gen to cut carbon dioxide (CO
2
) in the
power industry compared to other
sectors.
Eva Verena Klapdor, Head of Gas
Turbine Technology at Siemens En-
ergy, commented: “There has been a
lot of discussion on how hydrogen
could reduce emissions in the indus-
trial and transport sectors, but not
so much on how to it could reduce
carbon emissions in the power sector
itself, i.e. power-to-X-to-power.”
She added: “Batteries are ne for
short-term storage of excess renew-
able energy but if you want to move
to a future where you decarbonise the
energy system completely, then you
have to look at systems where you can
store energy for more than a couple of
days. Hydrogen is really an optimal
solution, whereby you could use it to
store renewable energy and then
convert it back to electricity at a later
date through a gas turbine in a com-
bined cycle plant or combined heat
and power plant.
“We have a vision that needs to be
demonstrated. You can do lots of cal-
culations and modelling of the eco-
nomic viability of such a solution
but… ultimately you have to go and
demonstrate it.”
The HYFLEXPOWER project will
Sector coupling: using renewable electricity to decarbonise energy across all sectors has huge environmental
and business benets
Smurt Kappa PRF’s site in Saillat-sur-Vienne, France
where the HYFLEXPOWER project will be built
mixing station prior to the turbine;
Siemens Energy will supply the elec-
trolyser for hydrogen production and
develop the hydrogen gas turbine;
and Centrax will upgrade the package
for hydrogen operation and install the
new turbine.
The universities will support the
project’s implementation with their
research know-how. “Our university
partners will play a vital role in un-
derstanding the detailed physics as
well as the social impact of the pro-
gramme,” said Klapdor. “The Athens
university is currently doing an eco-
nomic analysis and assessing the
social impacts. The Stuttgart univer-
sity is studying the ame behaviour
to support the combustion system
development.”
Following the kick-off meeting in
May, the consortium is progressing
with the designs. The rst important
milestone will be at the end of 2021
when the hydrogen production and
storage facility, including the elec-
trolyser, will be installed. The follow-
ing year will see the upgrade and in-
stallation of the gas turbine, and
during that summer the demonstration
of what Siemens Energy calls the
“advanced plant concept”.
Yilmaz said: “This will be the initial
demonstration of the entire plant – the
electrolyser for generating the hydro-
gen and the equipment for storing the
hydrogen and supplying it back to the
gas turbine. It will be done in phases.
Each time we will learn more about
operating with higher percentages of
hydrogen.”
Initially, Siemens Energy says that
the hydrogen content will be higher
than the 10 per cent the unit is already
capable of handling. The end goal is
to demonstrate the advanced energy
plant concept sometime in the sum-
mer-autumn of 2023 for 100 per cent
hydrogen.
In the meantime, Siemens Energy
will continue to adapt its turbine
combustor, while Centrax will make
the necessary upgrades to the turbine
package.
Siemens Energy also aims to dem-
onstrate the gas turbine can operate
on pure hydrogen in DLE mode. In
DLE combustion systems, fuel and
air are mixed prior to admission to
the combustion zone in order to
precisely control ame temperature.
This in turn allows the control of the
rates of chemical processes that
produce emissions such as nitrogen
oxides (NOx). The relative propor-
tions of fuel and air is one of the
driving factors for NOx but also for
ame stability. Hydrogen’s higher
reactivity poses specic challenges
for the mixing technology in DLE
systems. According to Siemens En-
ergy, this has never been demon-
strated when burning 100 per cent
hydrogen at an industrial site.
Hydrogen differs from hydrocar-
bon fuels by its combustion charac-
teristics, which pose unique chal-
lenges for gas turbine combustion
systems designed primarily for natu-
ral gas fuels. A key challenge is the
fast burning nature of hydrogen
compared to natural gas.
Klapdor explained: “The real chal-
lenge is having a combustion system
that can run on various mixtures hy-
drogen and natural gas – from 0-100
per cent hydrogen. The tricky part is
to stabilise the ame in the right part
of the burner. With the burner design
and the guidance of the airow, you
have to counteract the burning veloc-
ity of the hydrogen fuel/natural gas
mixture. So it has to be designed in
such a way as to create a stable, con-
trolled stream inside the combustion
chamber.”
Yilmaz added: “When you premix
the fuel, as the amount of hydrogen
increases you increase the chance of
combustion upstream – in an area that
is not designed to withstand high
temperatures.”
With regards to the turbine package,
the piping and materials used will
have to be altered according to the
site. If the materials at the site cannot
accommodate 100 per cent hydrogen,
they will have to be upgraded. The
pipe diameters may also need to be
adjusted.
Another key area is the explosion
safety systems. For an existing in-
stallation, the re protection system
and enclosure ventilation have to be
but will demonstrate the importance
of hydrogen as a long-term energy
storage technology for a grid that has
a high renewables penetration.”
HYFLEXPOWER is an important
advance on another project that
Siemens Energy is working on for
chemical company Braskem in Bra-
zil, where two SGT-600 DLE (dry
low emissions) gas turbines are
scheduled to begin commercial op-
eration on hydrogen in early 2021.
Here, hydrogen will be produced
from an industrial process as op-
posed to coming from renewables.
Delivery tests conducted in 2019
proved the turbines for that plant can
run on a mixture of up to 60 per cent
hydrogen by volume, while main-
taining NOx emissions of 25 ppm.
According to Siemens Energy, the
burners are designed for reliable op-
eration on 80 per cent hydrogen.
For hydrogen mixtures the relation-
ship between CO
2
reduction and hy-
drogen content is non-linear because
the hydrogen molecule has 2.5 times
the energy content of methane by
mass, but one-third on a volumetric
basis. Carbon dioxide emissions scale
by hydrogen mass content in the fuel,
while typically hydrogen and natural
gas mixtures are dened on a volu-
metric basis.
Explaining the signicance, Klap-
dor said: “If you look at the CO
2
re-
duction with 100 per cent hydrogen
versus 60 per cent hydrogen, you can
achieve more than double the
amount.”
It is clear that even with smaller
amounts of hydrogen in the fuel it is
still possible to make signicant
emission reductions. For example,
adding only 10 per cent volume hy-
drogen in the fuel will reduce CO
2
emissions by 2.7 per cent, which
would result in a reduction of 1.26
million metric tons of CO
2
for a refer-
ence 600 MW combined cycle power
plant that runs for 6000 hours a year
at an average 60 per cent efciency
This is why the concept to be
demonstrated at HYFLEXPOWER
is so important. As Yilmaz noted:
“HYFLEXPOWER will be the rst
time that we will be creating hydro-
gen using renewables and storing it
long-term; then supplying it back to
the gas turbine at the right time so it
can generate power for the grid and
heat for the process. It will be the
rst time that this will be done with
no CO
2
emissions.”
The HYFLEXPOWER project es-
sentially kicked off just over two
years ago when Siemens began to lay
out its technology roadmaps for its
gas turbines and other technologies
related to decarbonisation and the role
of hydrogen. Siemens’ vision to cut
carbon emission from gas red power
generation was one shared by Engie.
Yilmaz commented: “We wanted to
work with an industrial partner and at
the same time partner with govern-
ment. We found out that Engie, which
also had signicant interest in decar-
bonisation and CO
2
reduction, could
offer potential sites. We were also
aware that there was a government
opportunity under the European
Commission’s Horizon 2020 pro-
gramme. Following discussions, we
engaged Centrax and began really
intensifying our efforts and develop-
ing the proposal about a year ago.”
Under the project, an existing
Siemens SGT-400 industrial gas
turbine will be upgraded to convert
stored hydrogen into electricity and
thermal energy. According to Sie-
mens Energy it will be the rst time
an industrial scale power-to-hydro-
gen-to power project will be demon-
strated in a real world application.
The total budget for the project is
€15.2 million, of which €10.5 mil-
lion will be covered by the Horizon
2020 grant. The remainder will be
provided by the industry partners,
who will be responsible for the
overall project implementation.
Engie Solutions will build the hy-
drogen production and storage facility,
including the natural gas/hydrogen
Special Project Supplement
THE ENERGY INDUSTRY TIMES - OCTOBER 2020
Klapdor: Hydrogen is an optimal solution to store renewable
energy and then convert it back to electricity at a later date
Schematic of the EU-funded
HYFLEXPOWER project
THE ENERGY INDUSTRY TIMES - OCTOBER 2020
electrolysers is already under devel-
opment. These will be in the 100 MW
range and could be available by 2023.
Looking further ahead, it believes that
1000 MW units could be a reality
around the end of the decade.
This scaling is important if green
hydrogen is to compete with so-
called grey hydrogen. The hydrogen
market currently stands at around
80 million t/year, the vast majority of
which is grey hydrogen produced by
steam methane reforming of fossil
fuels. Green hydrogen currently only
represents 5 per cent of the market –
about 3.5 million t and less than 300
MW. But according to the Interna-
tional Energy Agency, this is pre-
dicted to reach nearly 3 GW in three
years, driven by ambitions for net-
zero carbon emissions by 2050.
To achieve this will require a big
push by policies and market design, as
well as an acceleration of renewables
deployment and continued scale-up of
electrolyser capacity.
Siemens Energy’s latest product, the
Silyzer 300, represents the current
state-of-the-art in terms of size for
PEM technology. The electrolyser
system that is currently being mar-
keted uses a standardised, modular
and pre-fabricated system concept
based on so called half- and full-array
(24 modules) congurations. Silyzer
300 is equipped with a fully auto-
mated water management system
(water treatment and renement
congured for hydrogen. “There are
stricter rules around safety standards
for high hydrogen content, since the
explosion risk is higher than for natu-
ral gas,” said Klapdor.
Hydrogen for the gas turbine pack-
age will be generated by an electroly-
ser based on the Siemens Energy Si-
lyzer portfolio. It is a PEM (proton
exchange membrane) type electrolys-
er, with high operational exibility.
This makes it ideally suited to produce
energy generated from volatile wind
and solar power. Notable features of
PEM electrolysers are: high efciency
at high power density; high product
gas quality, even at partial load; low
maintenance and reliable operation;
and no chemicals or impurities.
Siemens Energy has been using its
PEM technology to produce hydro-
gen from water since 2011, with the
introduction of its Silyzer 100. This
was a lab-scale unit of 0.1 MW. Since
2015, Siemens Energy has (with its
Silyzer 200) a MW-sized electrolyser
in operation. On average the company
has been scaling its electrolyser
portfolio by a factor of 10 every four
to ve years and in 2018 launched the
double-digit megawatt-class Silyzer
300. This is already being used in the
world’s largest power-to-gas project
in a steel plant .
The trend towards higher capacity
units is well under way. In a presenta-
tion on its hydrogen strategy, Siemens
Energy said the next generation of
loop), leveraging natural water circu-
lation. Operation with a natural circu-
lation of the process water means that
there are no pumps, actuated valves,
or other moving parts required in the
electrolyser core. This leads to high
reliability and availability and re-
duced maintenance requirements.
The full array conguration has a
power rating of 17.5 MW and is scal-
able to 100 MW and more.
Siemens Energy estimates that
roughly 1 t/h of hydrogen would be
needed to operate the HYFLEX-
POWER project’s SGT-400 on 100
per cent hydrogen. This is a signicant
amount, requiring a sizeable amount
of renewable electricity – the bulk of
which will come from nearby wind
farms owned by Engie.
Klapdor notes, however, that the
energy content of this quantity of hy-
drogen is in principle the same as for
natural gas. She said: “People always
say, that’s a lot of hydrogen and talk
about how much renewable electricity
is needed, but we need to be cognizant
that the amount of natural gas used
coming out of the ground is taken for
granted. We will be just substituting
the natural gas with hydrogen con-
taining the same energy content.
However, it’s good for people to think
about it because it highlights the re-
quired investment in renewables to
meet decarbonisation goals.”
HYFLEXPOWER is a four-year
project, and the plan is to complete
all the data analysis and socio-eco-
nomic assessments by April 2024.
This will signal the nalisation of the
demonstration.
It will be a key milestone in Siemens
Energy’s goal to make its entire tur-
bine range capable of burning 100 per
cent hydrogen. All of Siemens Ener-
gy’s gas turbines can already operate
on hydrogen fuel, with the specic
capability of a unit depending on the
gas turbine model and the type of
combustion system.
While some of its small and medium
DLE gas turbines can burn up to 60
per cent hydrogen, the current limit
for its large machines is 30 per cent.
The company’s technology roadmap
is to have its dry low emissions units
capable of running on 100 per cent
hydrogen by 2030 to meet customer
demand for their gas turbine portfolio.
Demonstrating 100 per cent hydro-
gen capability at the HYFLEXPOW-
ER project will be an important step
in realising that goal. Further, the
project’s outcome will no doubt give
potential users a realistic view on the
technology’s suitability in meeting
their future decarbonisation goals.
Certainly the project has attracted
signicant global interest.
Yilmaz concluded: “We have other
customers and partners interested in
this application and we are looking
to apply what we learn from this in-
stallation to other countries and in
different scenarios. The goal is to
build on this momentum and really
penetrate the combined heat and
power market.”
Yilmaz says other customers and partners are interested in the
application
SGT-400 industrial gas
turbine: Siemens Energy
also aims to demonstrate
the gas turbine can operate
on pure hydrogen in dry low
emissions mode
Siemens Energy’s Silyzer
300 full-array (17.5 MW) can
produce hydrogen for a gas
turbine package
Special Project Supplement
Siemens Energy is a registered trademark licensed by Siemens AG.
Together for
acarbon-free
future
siemens-energy.com
SE_Ads_290x380mm_08.indd 1SE_Ads_290x380mm_08.indd 1 10.09.20 13:2410.09.20 13:24
THE ENERGY INDUSTRY TIMES - OCTOBER 2020
13
Industry Perspective
S
everal oil and gas majors have
made clear their plans to shift
strategic focus. Just recently
BP, for example, in the face of a
massive fall in oil prices, said it will
invest tens of billions of dollars over
the next decade to meet its target of
becoming one of the world’s largest
renewable power generators and
achieve net-zero in its operations by
2050.
But the energy transition will be
complicated for these companies to
navigate. There are many factors at
play that make this more complex
than it may appear. So how to rise
above the crowd in these next few
years? Technology is proving to be a
valuable tool in navigating and thriv-
ing during the energy transition and
will help companies be leaders.
Global energy demand will contin-
ue to rise, according to most predic-
tions. There are two factors driving
these forecasts: population and stan-
dards of living. The Energy Informa-
tion Administration (EIA) forecasts
global energy demand to grow by al-
most 50 per cent between 2020 and
2050. This will continue to drive the
need for energy – the question is
which energy sources? And therefore
the “energy transition” required as
the sustainability movement drives
the globe towards “greener” energy
sources.
The challenge, of course, is the
formidable reality of global energy
mathematics. The numbers are so
high, that no matter what the rate of
adoption of renewable energy
sources, hydrocarbons will remain a
crucial element of the world energy
picture for decades.
So how can technology help adapt
hydrocarbon use to achieve better
sustainability results? Let’s look at
a few levers the industry has and
the key role technology will play.
Natural gas is emerging as an im-
portant future energy source, often
seen as a ‘bridge fuel” to reduce
carbon. To make natural gas trans-
portable, though, requires the ener-
gy-intensive and complicated lique-
faction (LNG) process. Technology
is playing a key role in improving
the costs and reliability of natural
gas supply. Digital twin models and
advanced control have already
proven to be crucial in the reduction
of energy use during LNG process-
ing.
Much more use of technology will
be necessary here, as the producers,
driven by both economic reality and
sustainability needs, are embracing
these proven approaches beyond the
initial successful adopters of these
tools. Each implementation of this
technology further advances the
‘green-ness’ of natural gas.
Huge capital has been tied up in
these projects, and so utilisation
rates of these capital-intensive LNG
plants is crucial. There, the pre-
scriptive maintenance technology,
which embeds machine learning
and advanced AI analytics in solu-
tions which alert operators to condi-
tions that create risk of degradation
of the high-capital compressors and
cold boxes, are now beginning to
have an important impact. The con-
dence of owners and developers in
this technology will enable several
large development projects to pro-
ceed quickly.
For highly complex and demand-
ing assets, such as LNG plants, the
self-optimising plant, a future vision
for industry in which data and AI
contribute to make these investments
self-learning, self-adapting, and self-
sustaining, will be important.
To achieve the aggressive targets
of global players, who are pledging
to reach “zero carbon” operations
by dates ranging from 2030 to
2050, increasing the pace of devel-
oping renewable power assets is
viewed as crucial. These technolo-
gies, though, are still relatively new
in terms of the maturity curve. Util-
ity scale wind and solar arrays are
just now beginning to reach the op-
erational phase where maintenance
and uptime become concerns.
Again, as is being applied for
LNG capital assets, wind farms
have already begun successfully
adopting prescriptive maintenance
solutions, which provide asset
health alerts to maximise the avail-
ability and utilisation of these large
assets, which have not yet estab-
lished a long-term reliability and
maintainability record. This ad-
vanced digitalisation technology
will be crucial in monitoring the
health of equipment which is inher-
ently installed remotely, under envi-
ronmental stresses, and requires
maximum uptime to be reliable in
the energy mix.
An interesting analysis compiled
by global political thinker Peter
Zeihan, looks at the distribution of
land across the globe that is suited
for utility-scale renewable electrici-
ty production. Interestingly, Zeihan
shows that roughly half of the
world’s population is located in
Eastern and Southeastern Asia,
which has low potential for solar
and wind farms. Perhaps as a conse-
quence of that, Southeast Asia has
pursued a path of exploitation of
palm oil plantations as a potential
source of bio-energy and bio-chem-
icals. The balance of that ledger,
however, is not clear, as clearing of
rainforest in favour of palm oil
farms, is arguably a net negative on
the sustainability scale.
Bioenergy conversion approaches,
including bioethanol, biodiesel,
waste-to-energy pyrolysis, algae
conversion, and biochemicals, have
gained acceptance at least partially
through the benet of subsidies and
government policy. Process model-
ing technology continues to be cru-
cial, although not widely enough
used, in improving the performance
of these processes. These processes
are hamstrung by the high energy
consumption of currently accepted
technology.
In order to contribute effectively to
sustainability and energy transition,
advanced modeling and optimisation
is needed to achieve fundamental
improvement. Dr. Eric Dunlop, a
specialist in large-scale biochemical
engineering projects and the algae
business, has pioneered these ap-
proaches in some groundbreaking
work on algae-to-fuels.
New startups continue to innovate
with novel new technologies to im-
prove bio-energy conversion, and the
new generation of hybrid modeling,
which combine AI analytics with
rigorous process modeling (such as
AspenTech’s innovative AI model
builder), will be playing a big role
here in improving the technical pace
of innovation and commercialisation
opportunities.
Reducing energy use is another
key area. Energy is consumed inef-
ciently in the conversion of hydro-
carbons, synthesis of chemicals and
the supply chain. Technology will
play a key role in helping the indus-
try navigate a drive towards carbon
neutrality. In addition to improving
energy efciency, optimisation
technologies can contribute to in-
creasing the production efciency
of oil and chemical operations. Both
digital twin monitoring systems and
dynamic optimisation solutions can
together save 5-15 per cent energy
use, reducing carbon emissions a
proportional amount.
Another great technology weapon
is utility supply optimisation. As
power plants looks to minimise car-
bon emissions, the choices between
oil, gas, biofuels, and renewables
can be made on a sophisticated ba-
sis. The choices can be made min-
ute-by-minute, or at any longer inter-
val. The technology can model the
interplay between multiple plants,
and multiple utility sources, for ex-
ample choosing between a wind en-
ergy source, natural gas-based elec-
tricity, or diesel combustion at the
plant, taking into account dollar cost,
carbon costs, and reliability.
So what is the future path for oil
and gas majors? Firstly, predicting
peak oil demand is the forecasters
elusive gold star. Will it be 2025,
2030, 2040 or later?
This will depend on factors in-
cluding global economic growth
(only really forecasted to grow sig-
nicantly in Asia), energy conserva-
tion (or “intensity”) in different re-
gions, a shift to electric power over
combustion and others. The IEA in
its most recent report has forecast
peak oil demand will take place in
the 2030s.
Corporations globally have ac-
knowledged the onset of the energy
transition. Some have chosen to re-
ect this through their investments
and their actions. An IHS Markit
analysis shows that Total, Shell, BP
and Equinor have made at least 66
acquisitions in the past several
years to diversify their energy port-
folios. Others have chosen to focus
on innovation in use of capital and
on operational excellence to build a
resilient market position.
As the industry navigates the ener-
gy transition, technology will be a
key partner as organisations and
their executives make strategic
moves to improve their agility and
competitive positions into the fu-
ture. Those companies who adopt
some or all of the technology op-
portunities mentioned will be bound
to have an advantage.
Ron Beck is Marketing Strategy Di-
rector at Aspen Technology.
A number of oil and
gas majors are now
grappling with making
a signicant shift into
renewables.
Aspen Technology’s
Ron Beck discusses
the technologies that
will help in what will
be a difcult transition
for them to make.
A random walk through the
A random walk through the
energy transition
energy transition
Beck: As is being applied
for LNG capital assets, wind
farms have already begun
successfully adopting
prescriptive maintenance
solutions
provide a connected view of the end-
to-end network of assets, based on
real operational data.
Operators and owners can imple-
ment these digital twins in several
ways: either they can purchase the
relevant tools from GE Digital and
build it themselves; or buy a twin
from GE Digital’s catalogue of twins
and input their own data. “We have
over 300 pre-built digital twins of
components in our APM systems, so
they can feed their data into the twin,
which then learns about their sys-
tem,” said Parris. The third way, he
notes, is for GE Digital to take the
customers data and build the twin.
One of the biggest challenges that
companies often face, however, is to
rst collect the necessary data, and
this to some degree is determining the
prevalence of the technology in the
various parts of the power sector.
Looking forward, Parris highlights
a few key areas of advancement in
digital twins and ways in which GE
Digital is working to accelerate their
use.
Although digital twins can bring
value and deliver savings through
early warning, prediction and optimi-
sation, he noted that operators are of-
ten not comfortable with basing their
strategies on twins to, for example,
predict the lifetime of a $20 million
sensor in a turbine.
“Getting people to adopt it is the
hardest thing. So about three years
ago we created something called
Humble AI, which takes into account
the zone of competency for a particu-
lar [digital] model; so you use the
model inside the zone of competency,
and when outside that zone you use a
different model or human and feed
that data back in so the AI system gets
smarter. That’s why it’s humble; it
knows what it doesn’t know and it
wants to learn.”
The technology has already been
developed for gas turbines and wind
turbines and Parris notes that it is
giving operators greater comfort in
terms of reducing risk.
Another area that Parris says GE
Digital is currently focusing on is
how to put this “all into a process
that people like”. The company is
therefore combining digital with
Lean methodology.
He explained: “Lean takes any
process you have and says: ‘tell me
what you are trying to solve.’ In
power, you might be trying to reduce
the cost of maintenance or increase
how much power you deliver at a
certain fuel level. So there’s a process
behind it. Lean will call for a value
map of the process, whereby all the
data will be pooled from the experts.
Lean is about pulling the data, and
that same data is what a data scientist
D
igitalisation has opened up all
kinds of possibilities in the
power sector. Yet there is one
area of digitalisation that can make a
profound difference – the concept of
the digital twin, a mirror of the physi-
cal world.
The digital twin is most commonly
dened as a software representation
of a physical asset, system or process
designed to detect, prevent, predict
and optimise through real-time ana-
lytics to deliver business value. The
technology has been around for
some time but with the Internet and
progress in technologies such as arti-
cial intelligence (AI) and machine
learning, digital twins are entering a
new phase, bringing new possibili-
ties to owners and operators of
power assets.
Colin Parris, Senior Vice President
and Chief Technology Ofcer, GE
Digital, has seen the technology
grow from its infancy to become an
important tool in GE Digital’s arse-
nal to better serve its customers’ ef-
forts to improve the operation and
value of their assets – whether in
power generation or transmission
and distribution.
He said: “The digital twin actually
came out of aviation and in particular
the military, perhaps a decade or
more ago. The Navy was looking at
how to understand the readiness of
an aircraft sitting on one of its carri-
ers. It’s not like a plane at an airport;
if you don’t plan for parts or service,
the aircraft doesn’t y and the mis-
sion is compromised.
“So the notion was: can I have a
digital model that can tell me the state
of readiness of an aircraft…? GE then
began thinking about how it could do
something like that, initially for its
Aviation business. And because we
also have turbines running every-
where for the electricity and energy
sectors – where typically we had to
give suppliers six or seven months
lead-time before the parts were needed
– it made sense to have digital twins.”
GE Digital then began to investigate
what else a twin might be able to do.
“Because we have engines that are in
the air, engines that are producing
electricity or engines that are pump-
ing oil out of the ground, we began to
see a pattern of what customers
wanted to do.
“First, they want an early warning
of a problem; with a jet engine you
need an early warning about failure.
In the energy sector, you want to be
warned about any anomalies – it’s
much better to x a bearing or blade
early rather than to get to a point
where there is damage that can cause
an engine to be out for six months.
The second is continuous predictions
on the remaining life of a part, to
understand what parts I need in my
inventory for when it has to be re-
placed. And the third thing is optimi-
sation: optimising a turbine for
highest energy delivery and lowest
fuel cost.”
GE Digital then moved to see how
this could be expanded across an
electricity network, looking at all the
components on the grid to optimise
the maximum amount of generation
for the lowest cost. This was then
extended to processes, such as smelt-
ing in order to consume the least
amount of electricity and least amount
and materials.
The digital twins that are increas-
ingly being adopted today are not like
the static models of the past that were
used to perhaps predict the behaviour
of a network at a given moment in
time. Today’s digital twins are what
Parris calls “living, learning models”
that take in a steady stream of data to
continuously update their models.
He said: “While there is widespread
use of things we call twins, which just
give insights from data coming in, we
are now moving into combining the
physics and AI to give us deeper and
deeper insights into what’s happen-
ing. There are twins in generation,
transmission and distribution and
there are especially new twins for
what is going with distributed energy
resources. People are wondering how
to model all of the electric vehicles
and battery sources that are coming
on line – with all the volatility it cre-
ates, you need twins and analytics to
help you.”
GE Digital is focused on how digital
twins can help its customers across
three core areas: assets, networks and
processes.
Addressing the power generation
sector, the company’s Asset Perfor-
mance Management (APM) software
solution creates digital twins based
on operational/eet data of: compo-
nents such as pumps or compressors;
critical assets, like turbines; or sys-
tems of assets such as an entire
power station. This type of digital
twin is an increasingly common tool
for operators of large equipment to
optimise their maintenance sched-
ules and to predict and avoid un-
planned downtime.
For transmission and distribution,
its Advanced Distribution Manage-
ment Solution (ADMS) and Geo-
graphic Information System (GIS)
use operational data from across the
network to create network digital
twins that can create virtual models.
These allow grid operators to better
manage and optimise networks, for
example, in the face of increasingly
extreme weather, aging infrastructure,
and the growing use of renewables
on the grid. Such twins essentially
THE ENERGY INDUSTRY TIMES - OCTOBER 2020
Executive Interview
14
Digital twins are an
exciting technology
with incredible
potential.
Junior Isles catches
up with GE Digital’s
Colin Parris for his
take on some of the
benets they bring
and a glimpse of
what’s to come.
A mirror to the future
A mirror to the future
needs... to create a model for embed-
ding in the process.
“Engineers like this combination of
digital and Lean because they all
know Lean, and now they can see
Lean inside of digital. Lean helps fo-
cus on the amount of money you will
save, or whatever it is you want to
change, while digital does the digital
transformation inside the process.
This is allowing the technology to
gain more traction in the industry.”
So what is the future of the technol-
ogy itself? Parris offered a glimpse of
a few research projects he has been
working on with investment from or-
ganisations such as the US Defense
Advanced Research Projects Agency
(DARPA) and the Intelligence Ad-
vanced Research Projects Activity
(IARPA).
Over the last three years they have
been investing money with GE Digi-
tal in an area called ‘Emerging Lan-
guages’. About ve years ago, GE
Digital began exploring the idea of
assets that could talk to each other and
solve problems.
Parris explained: “What if one wind
turbine could show another turbine
its sensor readings, ask if it has seen
these readings before and then ask:
‘what was the problem?’ And that
turbine could respond, saying for
example, I have seen these readings
before and it was a bearing problem.
And what if then, that asset could
communicate with us and tell us what
it thinks the problem is? This would
be tremendously helpful. It would
allow us to identify problems very
early on.”
GE began developing a language
between the turbines and has been
experimenting for the last year, with
“some interesting results”.
Parris said: “It can communicate
simple things like: there was a storm,
damage to a blade, this sensor reading
looks wrong and I think it’s this. It’s
at an early stage but what begins to
get me excited is the speed at which
they communicate, and the things that
they say is interesting.
“If you think about the next 4-5
years of this and get to a point where
machines are diagnosing themselves,
although humans will still be in-
volved, it will all be a lot faster.”
It’s an exciting future. On a wider
scale machines talking to each other
in such a way offers an incredible
opportunity in the ght against cli-
mate change.
Parris concluded: “It’s especially
relevant to me because of the decar-
bonisation problem. If you ever get
to a point where these assets are go-
ing to have to work together to reduce
carbon in the atmosphere, you want
them working together in the most
optimal way.”
Parris: we are now moving into
combining the physics and AI
to give us deeper and deeper
insights into what’s happening
THE ENERGY INDUSTRY TIMES - OCTOBER 2020
16
Final Word
I
t’s easy to get lost down the rabbit
hole of focusing on renewables
and new clean energy systems as
we strive to reduce carbon emissions
and halt climate change. Almost every
online conference or webinar (and
there have been way too many since
the lockdowns have prevented physi-
cal gatherings) has in some way fo-
cused on renewables. Whether it’s
increasing the use of wind and solar,
or energy storage to optimise the use
of intermittent generation, or smart
grids to accommodate uctuating gen-
eration, or the decarbonisation of in-
dustry and transport through greater
electrication using renewable sourc-
es – it almost always comes back to
renewables.
Clearly the reasoning is born of ne-
cessity. In its recently published ‘En-
ergy Transition Outlook’ (ETO), DNV
GL stated that despite a fall in carbon
dioxide emissions this year due to the
pandemic, “we will still blow past the
carbon budget for a 1.5°C future in
2028”. It said the 2°C carbon budget
would be exhausted by 2051.
It notes that the transition is happen-
ing at a fast pace, predicting that
“within a generation”, renewables and
fossil fuels will have roughly an equal
share of the energy mix compared to
an approximately 20-80 split today.
According to the company’s projec-
tions, solar capacity will expand by 20
times and wind 10-fold by 2050 as
costs plunge. Yet it will not be enough.
Policy levers are needed to stimulate
other technologies that are vital to
reduce energy use and emissions.
DNV GL says that carbon capture and
storage (CCS), for example, is a vital
component in decarbonising natural
gas, including the production of blue
hydrogen, but notes that a lack of
policy coordination means that by
2050 CCS will only capture 11 per cent
of carbon emissions, despite the
technology rst appearing in the
1970s.
Launching the ETO 2020, Remi
Eriksen, Group President and CEO of
DNV GL, said: “We can’t empty the
airliners twice, so we need all hands
on deck to nd practical solutions to
the climate crisis – now. The rapid rise
of solar PV, wind and battery tech-
nologies in recent years gives me hope
that humanity has solutions at hand.
However the so-called hard to abate
sectors need strong policy incentive to
move the needle on decarbonisation.
Decarbonised natural gas, including
hydrogen, will play a key role in the
transition to the energy future human-
ity wants and needs.”
Similar observations were made by
the International Energy Agency in its
recent Energy Technologies Perspec-
tive (ETP) 2020 the rst core ETP
report for three years following a re-
vamp of the series.
The report analyses more than 800
different technology options to assess
what would need to happen to reach
net zero emissions by 2070. The
blistering pace of technological
transformation that would be neces-
sary for the world to reach net zero
emissions by 2050 is explored in the
report’s ‘Faster Innovation Case’. It
nds that to meet the huge increase in
demand for electricity, additions of
renewable power capacity every year
through 2050 would need to average
around four times the current annual
record, which was achieved in 2019.
The report stresses that energy in-
novation will be crucial but sees
“reason for optimism”, despite the
disruption and uncertainty caused by
the pandemic. Dr Fatih Birol, the
IEAs Executive Director stated:
“Investment in clean energy start-ups
by venture capital funds and compa-
nies rose to a new record in 2019. And
governments and businesses are -
nally putting serious resources into
the clean energy potential of hydro-
gen, which this report makes clear
will be critical for reaching net zero
emissions.”
But his most important takeaway
from the report is the major challenge
of how to tackle emissions from the
vast amount of existing energy-related
infrastructure around the world.
“Personally, the most important
blind spot in the climate change debate
today is the overwhelming focus on
what we are going to build – the new
power plants, new factories, new cars
– and that they should be clean and
sustainable,” said Dr Birol. “Yes they
should be, and we should focus on
them but there’s a big issue: we have
built power plants, steel and cement
factories for years and years and they
will be with us for several decades to
come. Without addressing emissions
from the world’s existing infrastruc-
ture, we will have no chance whatso-
ever of meeting our energy and climate
goals.”
According to the IEA, if no action
is taken, today’s existing infrastruc-
ture will emit about 750 Gt of CO
2
over the next ve decades. The bulk
of cumulative emissions from exist-
ing infrastructure is expected to come
from the power (55 per cent) and
heavy industry (26 per cent) sectors,
reecting their large shares of emis-
sions today and the long lifetimes of
the assets, e.g. power stations and
manufacturing facilities.
Timur Gül, the IEA’s Head of Tech-
nology Policy and director of the re-
port, said there would be no chance of
fully decarbonising the energy sector
by 2050 unless “we nd a way to ad-
dress emissions from these existing
assets”.
How each country tackles the prob-
lem will depend on its individual cir-
cumstances and the age of the different
facilities. Some may opt for retrotting
or modernisation, and some may go
for early retirement. In Asia for ex-
ample, 80 per cent of existing coal red
generating capacity was built in the
last 20 years – retiring these early will
be hard to justify economically.
The existing coal plant eet, along
with emissions from industry are
particularly tough nuts to crack. Green
hydrogen is attracting increasing inter-
est as a way of decarbonising industry
and transport (alongside electric ve-
hicles). CCS and CCUS (carbon
capture utilisation and storage) has
been promoted for some time as a way
to address the existing coal, and to a
lesser extent gas, power generation
eet but the economics still do not
stack up. There could be a case for
industrial settings and there has been
some progress here, but the uptake of
CCS/CCUS in the power sector has
been woeful.
Gül commented: “Progress with
CCS technology has been somewhat
behind expectation over the last de-
cade but it is a technology that we will
ultimately need in certain applica-
tions such as cement [production]; to
produce synthetic fuels; and to remove
CO
2
emissions from the atmosphere.”
According to Dr Birol, of the 800
technology options covered by the
report, CCUS, hydrogen, batteries and
bioenergy, “appear to be the frontrun-
ners today” and are “the game-
changing technologies that are ready
for the big time”. But with regards to
CCUS, he also concedes that although
“the technology has been with us for
a long time, we have still not seen a
major breakthrough yet”.
Still, he maintains it is a necessity.
“In my view, we don’t have many
options to have a bridge between our
huge fossil fuel assets and our climate
goals.”
That may be so but the economics
will have to change and this can only
come with a big policy push to drive
the price of carbon.
In the meantime, the world will
likely continue to focus on how it can
increasingly utilise renewable energy
sources, which are becoming cheaper
and cheaper. Renewables in power
generation and greater electrication
of industry and transport can do much
in navigating the road to net zero but
it is difcult to see how they can get
us there alone, and by 2050.
Like Alice in Wonderland, we will
have to go further down the rabbit hole
– pursuing maximum use of renew-
ables going forward without losing
sight of the technologies that are
needed for the fossil fuel and indus-
trial installations of today. It is a
complex journey but let us hope that
chasing zero emissions is not as cha-
otic as chasing Alice’s white rabbit.
Chasing the white rabbit
Junior Isles
Cartoon: jemsoar.com