THE ENERGY INDUSTRY TIMES - AUGUST 2019
15
Technology
A new process for
capturing carbon
dioxide is being
demonstrated at a
pilot project at the
Drax power station in
the UK.
Junior Isles reports.
A
ccording to many industry
observers, the world will not
be able to achieve its climate
ambitions without carbon capture
and storage (CCS). Although the
electricity sector is making a rapid
transition away from fossil fuels,
globally, coal and gas will continue
to play a signicant a role for de-
cades to come. Finding a way of de-
carbonising existing and future fossil
red eet is therefore crucial. Cut-
ting carbon emissions in industry is
also important and currently there
are very limited options when it
comes to cutting carbon dioxide
emissions.
The International Energy Agency
(IEA) states that CCS could reduce
global CO
2
emissions by 19 per cent,
and that ghting climate change
could cost 70 per cent more without
CCS.
But in spite of the pressing need
for the technology, its commercial
uptake has been very slow. A report
published in May by the Internation-
al Association of Oil and Gas Pro-
ducers (IOGP) noted there are only
18 commercial projects in operation
globally today with a total capture
capacity of some 40 Mtpa CO
2
.
CCS deployment has been predom-
inantly limited by economics – sev-
eral projects have seen budgeted
capital costs spiral, and the technolo-
gy also imposes an energy penalty
on power plants, which makes the
business case in power generation
challenging.
But this could be set to change as a
team of chemists and engineers look
to implement a new carbon capture
technology at the massive Drax
power station in North Yorkshire,
UK.
In June, C-Capture, the designer of
innovative chemical processes for
carbon dioxide removal, working
alongside the Drax Group, secured a
£5 million grant from the UK gov-
ernment for a two year programme
of work to progress their £11 million
bioenergy and carbon capture and
storage (BECCS) pilot project at
Drax.
The funding will be used by
Leeds-based C-Capture, a company
established in 2009 out of Leeds
University’s School of Chemistry
following investment from IP
Group, and Drax’s Innovation team
to further develop its understanding
of how C-Capture’s technology
could be scaled up.
Explaining the origins of C–Cap-
ture and the technology, Professor
Chris Rayner, an organic chemist
and Founder of the group, said:
“About 10 years ago, maybe longer,
we started looking at ways where we
could selectively get CO
2
to react in
the presence of other gases – particu-
larly things like nitrogen and oxy-
gen, which is typically what is in
ue gases – and try to develop new
chemistry to do that. People have
been doing CO
2
separation for many
years. The original technology pat-
ented in the 1930s used amines.
They capture CO
2
very well but
they’ve been around for so long,
when we set up C-Capture we
thought there must be a better way to
do it.”
After four or ve years of research
and development, the company has
come up with a process that allows
CO
2
to be captured under much
milder conditions than has been pre-
viously possible.
“The chemistry is much better in
terms of performance and environ-
mental prole but still uses very sim-
ple chemicals... and for the scale that
CCS is done on, it has to be simple
and really scalable,” said Professor
Rayner.
The technology is what Professor
Rayner calls a post-combustion, sol-
vent-based capture process.
He explained: “When you gener-
ate power, you’re usually burning
something... The ue gas produced
will usually have anything between
5-15 per cent of CO
2
, as well as
quite a lot of nitrogen and some ox-
ygen. The key thing is to selectively
react the CO
2
and leave anything
else unreacted.”
This is achieved in a two-step pro-
cess. The rst stage has an absorber
column, where a shower of the new
amine-free solvent comes down the
column while the ue gas is blown
upwards. When the solvent comes
into contact with the ue gas, it se-
lectively reacts with the CO
2
, leaving
the remaining gases to continue up-
wards to exit the top of the column
free of CO
2
.
Solvent with CO
2
attached to it re-
mains at the bottom of the column.
This is then pumped into a stripper
column that operates at a much high-
er temperature, around 100-120°C,
compared to 20-30°C in the rst. At
this temperature, the bond between
the solvent and the CO
2
breaks and
the CO
2
comes out of the stripper
column as a pure stream that can be
used or sequestered. This stripper
column also serves to regenerate the
solvent, so that “lean” solvent is
ready to capture more CO
2
.
“It’s a continuous process, where
the solvent is pumped around the ab-
sorber and stripper, so ue gas goes
into one end and a stream of CO
2
comes out of the other,” said Profes-
sor Rayner.
The key thing in the process is the
new class of solvent, which has quite
a different reactivity compared to
amines. An important aspect of the
solvents is their energy requirement
– a big drawback with current sol-
vent-based post combustion capture
is they require a signicant amount
of energy to heat up the solvent in
order to release the CO
2
. This para-
sitic load reduces the efciency of
the power station.
According to Professor Rayner, the
new solvents are less reactive with
air than existing amine solvents and
therefore oxidise less, resulting in
less degradation over time. “We
think we have major benets in
terms of solvent lifetime compared
with the current best technologies,”
he noted.
He added that the new solvents are
much less corrosive than many of
the amines that are currently used.
This means cheaper construction
materials can be used, which could
in turn signicantly lower the cost of
building plants.
With the economics of CCS being
a major stumbling block, the devel-
opment of the technology comes at a
crucial time.
Professor Rayner said: “Pretty
much everyone says we need to de-
carbonise as rapidly as we can. In
three of the four scenarios presented
by the IPCC, we need CCS to limit
warming to 2°C... if the [UK] gov-
ernment is to reach its net zero target
by 2050, then CCS is essential. So
we need to start doing things now
and we need to start doing them on
scale.
“Costs are an issue but there have
been numerous high-level studies
that show that the cost of doing noth-
ing far outweighs the cost of deploy-
ing CCS... The costs of these things
are always coming down.”
“To calculate the cost of capturing
a tonne of CO
2
from a very large
power station is a very difcult cal-
culation but what I can say, is that
the energy penalty of our process is
signicantly lower when comparing
our technology with others that are
out there. World-leading amine pro-
cesses use about 2.5 GJ per tonne of
CO
2
captured. Ours is in the region
of 1.5-2 GJ/t. The Drax project is
trying to understand that number and
rm up whether it’s nearer to 1.5 or
2. Even if it’s 2 GJ, that’s still a ma-
jor improvement compared to all the
current technologies.”
Since it began capturing carbon
dioxide in February, proving the
technology works, the team at the
Drax pilot has done different up-
grades on the solvent and this work
will continue.
The recent government grant will
help take the pilot project up from
about 1 t/day of CO
2
capture to 100
t/day over the next two years. This
size will provide much of the
chemistry and engineering informa-
tion needed to design a much larger
process.
“We hope that we will have every-
thing we need to design a very large
process within a couple of years,”
said Professor Rayner. To give an
idea of the nal scale needed, he
says Drax would need roughly a 10
000 t/day capture installation on its
site.
The Drax pilot will be running for
at least another six months before
trials are shifted to Norway. Here a
chemistry validation and testing pro-
gramme will be conducted with re-
search partners SINTEF and the CO
2
Technology Centre Mongstad. The
pilot scale rigs at Mongstad will en-
able more accurate measurement of
parameters such as energy consump-
tion and emissions. In addition to be-
ing larger in scale, the Norway facil-
ity will also provide a degree of
independent validation.
“As the programme begins to get
nalised at Drax we will move
things over to Norway, which will
probably be some time towards the
end of next year,” said Professor
Rayner. “It will happen when we
think we have enough good data to
operate the plant in Norway.”
The goal is to have a large scale
process on the Drax site in the mid
2020s. This would coincide with the
government’s timeframe of having
CO
2
capture clusters and CO
2
trans-
port infrastructure in place.
“There’s no point building a big
capture plant if you have no way of
disposing of the CO
2
,” noted Profes-
sor Rayner. “Over the next 5-10
years, there will be lots of develop-
ments where clusters of CO
2
produc-
ers will have to come together in dif-
ferent locations to provide hubs,
which can then take the CO
2
via
pipelines to the North Sea for stor-
age in geological features, mainly
depleted oil wells.”
With Drax being the UK’s largest
power plant, and one that has
switched from coal to biomass, the
world will be watching this next step
closely. Notably, as it runs on bio-
mass it will become the world’s rst
negative emissions power station –
effectively removing carbon dioxide
from the atmosphere while electrici-
ty is being produced. This is impor-
tant in offsetting emissions from oth-
er sectors that are very difcult to
decarbonise such as aviation.
Professor Rayner summed up:
“The Drax project has given us a
high prole, which has helped with
enquiries from outside. Now, a num-
ber of projects are under discussion
around world. We also will be de-
ploying the technology in other areas
which require large scale CO
2
sepa-
ration such as industrial emitters like
cement, iron and steel, and hydrogen
manufacture, and gas upgrading ap-
plications, such as purication of
natural gas and biogas.
“Working with Caspar Schoolder-
man, our COO and Director of En-
gineering and Doug Barnes, Head
of Chemistry, we’ve developed
something that is incredibly new
and important for the future... see-
ing something go from a very small
scale in a lab up to, say, 10 000 t of
CO
2
capture a day, would be awe-
some. And that really is just getting
things started.”
CCS gets some new
chemistry
Professor Rayner: “we’ve
developed something that is
incredibly new and important
for the future”