THE ENERGY INDUSTRY TIMES - JANUARY 2019
13
Industry Perspective
T
he three ‘D’s – decarbonisa-
tion, decentralisation and digi-
talisation – are very interesting
but what are we missing? Do they
have unintended consequences hid-
den in what we cannot see?” It is a
thought-provoking question posed
by Dr Lawrence E. Jones, Vice Pres-
ident International Programs, Edison
Electric Institute (EEI), as he speaks
about “understanding the invisibles”
and why “what we can’t see denes
what we see”.
Dr Jones, who was in London to
participate in the Transatlantic Dia-
logue on Cyber Security Strategy
and Preparedness co-organised by
EEI and UK Power Networks, starts
by explaining that for the ‘D’s to
work, we have to focus on the ‘I’s –
integration, interdependence, inde-
pendence, interconnectivity, intelli-
gence, interoperability and
innovation.
“These ‘I’s are very important. The
‘D’s are at the big picture, macro
level but at the end of the day, you
have to think about integration…
and in particular innovation; the in-
visible innovations that keep this en-
ergy industry going and in fact keeps
society functioning.”
While many might not see the en-
ergy industry as innovative, Dr Jones
points out that there is an incredible
amount of innovation that goes into
the technology and physical infra-
structure behind lighting a room
through the simple ip of a switch.
Yet because that technology is not
seen, it is not viewed as innovative
and not valued by society in perhaps
the same way as an iPhone.
“The ‘D’s sound great but it’s all
the things behind that you don’t see
that are the things that are really
shaping what’s happening in our
world. The challenge we have is:
what do we have to do to make the
invisible more visible and therefore
valued in a way that it’s OK to pay
for the invisibility that actually keeps
the lights on?”
Indeed, not recognising the value
of things that are commonly taken
for granted in developed countries
can present difculties. For example,
a utility can sometimes face chal-
lenges when securing support for
investing in physical infrastructure.
“A lot of what we do is predicated
on having a physical infrastructure
that works… but investments in the
physical infrastructure have to be
paid for,” explains Dr Jones. “Your
stakeholders – regulators, consum-
ers, investors – have to understand
that investments, backed by good re-
turns, need to be made in the invisi-
bles because of the value they create.
But people want services to be pro-
vided at an ever-cheaper cost. It
sometimes becomes difcult to
make the business case for, say,
modernising electricity infrastruc-
tures when the stakeholders just
don’t see it. Yet having an electricity
system that is consistently at least
99.9 per cent reliable is only possible
by investing in those invisibles…?”
So what are some of those invisi-
bles that are becoming increasingly
important? Dr Jones points to tech-
nologies such as articial intelli-
gence (AI), machine learning, auton-
omous systems, data analytics,
smarter grid equipment, and hyper-
personalisation.
He explains: “Today almost every-
thing you do is controlled by an al-
gorithm. In our business, I call these
the algorithms that light up the
world. The sad thing is, you may not
even know these algorithms exist.
But those are the innovations that are
driving our industry, driving the
transition.”
But as society moves to a scenario
where everything can be measured
to furnish increasing amounts of
data and create digital twins to im-
prove system modelling, simulation
and control, Dr Jones fears there is
a danger of moving to a world
where we “over-value the digital”
and under-value the physical”. The
problem, he says, is the “value lens”
used by stakeholders.
“If you look at a lot of stock mar-
ket valuations of companies today,
you will see that a lot of those com-
panies valued at billions of dollars
have a digitally-based business mod-
el; they don’t own any physical as-
sets. The Facebook and Ubers of the
world have huge market capitalisa-
tion and all they are offering for the
most part – the deliverable – is an
experience or, in some cases, infor-
mation. I’m not saying it’s not im-
portant; it’s what people value. But
why is it that the physical infrastruc-
ture, something that is so fundamen-
tal to modern society, is less valued
by the market and society at-large?”
Indeed it is perhaps a strange val-
ue lens that society uses, since the
digital world cannot exist without
the physical world. In some coun-
tries, it is perhaps more easy to ap-
preciate the digital world because
the physical world has already
been built. However, this built en-
vironment must be ma
intained and upgraded.
He says it is an issue that needs se-
rious consideration when thinking
about decentralisation. Digitalisation
is a major driver and facilitator of
decentralisation. The creation of vir-
tual power plants through the aggre-
gation of devices and the technology
needed to create smart grids to en-
able prosumers, and micro-grids
where users can conduct peer-to-
peer transactions, are all part of the
digitalisation movement.
But Dr Jones is not convinced that
the future is purely decentralised. As
the world’s population grows and
mega-cities become even larger, he
asks: “When you think of urbanisa-
tion and a world with 10 billion peo-
ple, the question is: can you run a
world with 10 billion people on de-
centralised power?
“As those populations grow, how
can we provide electricity in those
large urban areas where there are not
enough rooftops or land [for solar
panels] for providing electricity?
And there will be times when the
sun doesn’t shine or the wind doesn’t
blow. So we should be careful not to
create an either or scenario.”
Dr Jones believes the future is “hy-
brid”, a mix of centralised and de-
centralised solutions. He warns,
however, that in this “age of hybridi-
ty” – where there is a mix of central-
ised and decentralised systems and
the digital world is integrated with
the physical world – there are issues
that need to be seriously considered.
“There will be a need for greater
coordination in terms of planning
because there is an interdependency.
No one builds a micro-grid with the
goal of it continuing to run as a mi-
cro-grid. People ultimately want a
micro-grid to expand – who builds a
micro-grid to serve just one custom-
er? So we have to consider how the
micro-grid will interact with the
macro-grid and vice versa. So there
has to be more integrated planning
of hybrid systems.”
He says new approaches to plan-
ning are being looked at around the
world. “Research institutes are look-
ing at it, and utilities and network
operators themselves are beginning
to look at it and incorporate it into
their thinking and planning. If you
don’t take a holistic approach, it
sometimes becomes difcult to see
the true value of everything along
the value chain, or more increasingly
the value networks.”
He added: “We haven’t found a
way to come up with the analytical,
legal frameworks, etc., to assess the
merits of these hybrid systems to-
gether, as one… The digital and
physical worlds are coming together
but, in general, we still address them
as silos.
“If you look at the investment
model for investing in the physical
world, they are long-lived assets. A
transmission line, for example, is de-
signed to last many years. But the
time horizon for investment in the
digital world is different, so you
have to have a more integrated ap-
proach when assessing the merits of
the ‘digital-physical’ world.”
One major concern in the area of
digitalisation, and the proliferation
of digital twins in particular, is the
issue of data – its accuracy and pri-
vacy. “Inaccurate data means inaccu-
rate behaviour of the twin,” he said.
“The other important thing is cyber
security, making sure you can secure
the protection of that data. This has
to be key.”
The move to digitalisation has po-
tential ramications that reach far
and wide, leading Dr Jones to pose
several interesting questions.
“Why should we care about the
black boxes? Those invisible algo-
rithms are doing stuff you don’t
know about. What happens when
the algorithms autonomously gener-
ate new algorithms that function in
a way that dees legal and regulato-
ry frameworks? Regulators are in
trouble because they have no under-
standing of these algorithms. What
if AI gives biased results based on
biased information? What does that
mean for how systems will evolve?
And what happens if the predictive
analytics give a wrong prediction?”
In the power sector, this could be a
huge issue in forecasting. In a tradi-
tional power system, network opera-
tors are able to balance supply and
demand because they have a good
understanding of the demand, its lo-
cation and the rate at which it goes
up and down. But in a more digi-
tised, decentralised, world it is not so
straightforward.
Dr Jones observes: “When we
don’t have that level of sophistica-
tion, we start to rely on predictive
analytics to help forecast the behav-
iour of all those interconnected de-
vices. So if our prediction of a cer-
tain pattern, for example a
consumption pattern or charging/
discharging pattern, is wrong,
what’s the recourse? It becomes an
interesting scenario, even in terms
of regulatory framework. If a regu-
lator designs a bad framework be-
cause they are unable to do holistic
scenario planning for what the
world will look like, there could be
implications.”
Moving forward, Dr Jones says the
global industry should adopt indus-
try-specic solutions and business
models. While he believes that
blockchain, for example, has its
merits, talk of it being the game-
changing technology for the energy
industry is perhaps “a little over-
blown”. Neither does he believe that
platform approaches such as those
used by Uber are really suitable.
He concluded: “Uberisation and
other digital business models do not
necessary lend themselves to some
of the physical things we’d like to do
in energy… digitalisation in terms of
improving operations is important
but I don’t see how some of these
models that don’t require a physical
system can be applied to the energy
sector.
“I’d like to consider myself a real-
istic energy futurist. We have to
adopt solutions that reect the needs
and expectations of the customer in a
given industry environment. While
the ‘D’s of the energy transition are
global in scale, the ‘I’s which are
key to realising the transition are lo-
cal in character. Welcome to the age
of hybridity!”
As the face of
the energy sector
continues to change,
TEI Times caught
up with Edison
Electric Institute’s Dr
Lawrence E. Jones to
discuss his views on
some of the industry’s
challenges and key
issues that will shape
it as it moves forward.
Junior Isles
Dr Jones: “It’s all the things behind that you don’t see that are the things that are really shaping
what’s happening in our world.”
Understanding the invisibles